Watch the Footage archive

NeverSlender wrote:[That's pretty good. Not sure how My. A would take it.

By the way we need to get Mr. A into the coffee shop.

Indeed. Let's plot about it in the coffee shop. I honestly cannot remember what we were talking about here, but I know that plotting to drug Mr. A with Green Stuff(TM) wasn't it.

NeverSlender wrote:By the way we need to get Mr. A into the coffee shop.

Looks like I was missing out on something...

NeverSlender wrote:

IslaKariese wrote:

NeverSlender wrote:It's a better idea than having us try to plan something.

Mr. A: FOR ONCE IN YOUR INSIGNIFICANT EXISTENCE, CAN ANY OF YOU PLAN SOMETHING WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME?
Us: We're tropers, you're pushy, and there are a thousand more interesting things to do than do what you say all the time. We wouldn't hold out too much hope, no.

That's pretty good. Not sure how Mr. A would take it.

By the way we need to get Mr. A into the coffee shop.

... The multiverse would never be the same.

Luck with getting him out of the void.

Hey, Mr. A? If we left a laptop at the meeting place, would you be interested in attending the meet?

Wysp wrote:I'm considering dropping the name Benjamin Barker in casual conversation with Ms. Matters. Thoughts?

Why not just flat out ask her? I could do it by laying some groundwork first.

Because she'd flip if doctor-patient confidentiality was breached. As others have pointed out, she likes me, so I don't want her to flip on me.

Wysp wrote:Because she'd flip if doctor-patient confidentiality was breached.

I'm pretty sure she requested we don't ask for details at some point.

That's why I said use a throwaway e-mail, a proxy server, and another name. Try starting a convo claiming you are in Boston and be like, "Hey, that sounds like this guy I know called Benjamin Barker". Even if it falls through and she gets mad the fake name ought to protect you fine.

Wysp wrote:Because she'd flip if doctor-patient confidentiality was breached. As others have pointed out, she likes me, so I don't want her to flip on me.

I'm mostly an outsider on ther thread of events... So, it does not matter if she goes ballistic on me... I'm also the one who got the top curse form the Witch in for trying to get her mad enough to reveal something. =P

Sounds like it'll work--go for it.

How's this; act like you know him and that he had gone missing. You recognised him from the blog descriptions and your concerned about him.

NeverSlender wrote:How's this; act like you know him and that he had gone missing. You recognised him from the blog descriptions and your concerned about him.

Nice one. *Is very impressed* However, I dunno if it will stand if the GMs decide to meta-game after reading this thread.

Sicon112 wrote:

NeverSlender wrote:How's this; act like you know him and that he had gone missing. You recognised him from the blog descriptions and your concerned about him.

Nice one. *Is very impressed* However, I dunno if it will stand if the GMs decide to meta-game after reading this thread.

She's looking for info on the patient. If it's him, the only way out would be to lie, which I don't think the GMs would do. (I hope your reading this GMs. I'm trusting you).

The GMs probably won't meta-game, it's cheap and unfair. However, you'll have a hard time holding up that story about knowing him personally.

Wysp wrote:The GMs probably won't meta-game, it's cheap and unfair. However, you'll have a hard time holding up that story about knowing him personally.

If we're right we should know enough about the character to answer any questions she has.

NeverSlender wrote:

Wysp wrote:The GMs probably won't meta-game, it's cheap and unfair. However, you'll have a hard time holding up that story about knowing him personally.

If we're right we should know enough about the character to answer any questions she has.

True. Well, I know nothing about him regardless, so I'll have to pass this time.

I suppose you could claim to be an acquaintance from London.

Seed planted.

I didn't ask if her patient is Barker, but rather said that I'm looking for a firend called Benjamin Barker that fits her descriptions and if she could have him contact me if he's the same... Well... wait and see.

Where did you ask this? I'd like to be able to follow along.

Wysp wrote:Where did you ask this? I'd like to be able to follow along.

Well, I did ask through Twitter.
I'm @PixelmageLeazard
Tweet to @mindsNmatters

New post to draw atention. But it's just a update.
As predicted, the attempt to drop the name "Benjamin Barker" to the therapist failed. She didn't shoot me, so I guess it's all good.

The tweet:
https://twitter.com/mindsNmatters/statu ... 0860954624

Pixelmage wrote:New post to draw atention. But it's just a update.
As predicted, the attempt to drop the name "Benjamin Barker" to the therapist failed. She didn't shoot me, so I guess it's all good.

The tweet:
https://twitter.com/mindsNmatters/statu ... 0860954624

It's him. It's got to be, otherwise she could just say "it's not your friend, sorry".

NeverSlender wrote:

Pixelmage wrote:New post to draw atention. But it's just a update.
As predicted, the attempt to drop the name "Benjamin Barker" to the therapist failed. She didn't shoot me, so I guess it's all good.

The tweet:
https://twitter.com/mindsNmatters/statu ... 0860954624

It's him. It's got to be, otherwise she could just say "it's not your friend, sorry".

The issue isn't that we don't know, it's that we need them to SAY it. With our current level of information on the subject, we have reached the point at which the probability of a miscalculation is so tiny that it's perfectly safe to begin planning assuming that we are right. However, to get them to say it somehow is the last boost we need to have everything in place, rename the forum section, and sit down to start figuring out how to deal with Todd.

Sicon112 wrote:

NeverSlender wrote:

Pixelmage wrote:New post to draw atention. But it's just a update.
As predicted, the attempt to drop the name "Benjamin Barker" to the therapist failed. She didn't shoot me, so I guess it's all good.

The tweet:
https://twitter.com/mindsNmatters/statu ... 0860954624

It's him. It's got to be, otherwise she could just say "it's not your friend, sorry".

The issue isn't that we don't know, it's that we need them to SAY it. With our current level of information on the subject, we have reached the point at which the probability of a miscalculation is so tiny that it's perfectly safe to begin planning assuming that we are right. However, to get them to say it somehow is the last boost we need to have everything in place, rename the forum section, and sit down to start figuring out how to deal with Todd.

This comes pretty close to confirmin it though. She might not be allowed to say who it is but surely she can say who it's not.

NeverSlender wrote:This comes pretty close to confirmin it though. She might not be allowed to say who it is but surely she can say who it's not.

Yeah, I was agreeing with you. XD