Watch the Footage archive

Come to the Tara case thread in Holmes to talk of evidence. Dealing with Don stays here.

narrativedilettante wrote:Also, Don is BSODing right now. We need to give him some time/space before we ask things of him.

I don't even see how Don could have the number, unless it was his. We don't know if he was at the apartment when she was murdered or if he arrived much later. But then again, how could he have known she was killed if he couldn't get inside due to the door being locked?

Correction: We need the number AND the service provider. One without the other is useless; calling the number is the LAST thing we want to do.

Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:Correction: We need the number AND the service provider. One without the other is useless; calling the number is the LAST thing we want to do.

Already working on that. This should go to the Tara Case thread in Holmes.

Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:We need the number AND the service provider. One without the other is useless

Why? Am I missing something?

Dryunya wrote:

Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:We need the number AND the service provider. One without the other is useless

Why? Am I missing something?

We need to check the last number dialled remotely. The service provider has that information. We need to contact them, tell them the number, and ask for information on the most recent calls to or from that number.
Without the service provider, we've got no one to ask; without the number, they've got no way of giving us an answer.

More on this in the Tara Coulson Case thread (Holmes' forum).

Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:

Dryunya wrote:

Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:We need the number AND the service provider. One without the other is useless

Why? Am I missing something?

We need to check the last number dialled remotely. The service provider has that information. We need to contact them, tell them the number, and ask for information on the most recent calls to or from that number.
Without the service provider, we've got no one to ask; without the number, they've got no way of giving us an answer.

More on this in the Tara Coulson Case thread (Holmes' forum).

I don't understand your reasoning. Why can't we have the number without the service provider?

Because then we've got no way of finding out information on it.
We don't want to call the number. We want to find out the last number dialled. Only the physical phone itself, and the service provider, have that information.
Therefore, we need to know the service provider, so we can ask them.

Quixote doesn't have her number.

Victin wrote:Quixote doesn't have her number.

He can ask Tripky. Too bad if he hates the guy; this is more important. Tripky will have it.

Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:

Victin wrote:Quixote doesn't have her number.

He can ask Tripky. Too bad if he hates the guy; this is more important. Tripky will have it.

Could it be on the phone agenda? Or in "made/received calls"?

We're talking about a landline, I believe.
*69 or asking the landline are our only options.

Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:

Victin wrote:Quixote doesn't have her number.

He can ask Tripky. Too bad if he hates the guy; this is more important. Tripky will have it.

If it helps find Tara's killers, I'm pretty sure he'll suck it up and go talk to the guy. He will want to help, too, I suspect - he would want to clear his name.

Quixote intends to show us her video tomorrow after his meeting with Sherlock. Brace yourselves for something big, I suspect.

So uh I checked on the Timeline in the morning to see that Tara is dead.

Well this got dark ridiculously fast.

JRPictures wrote:So uh I checked on the Timeline in the morning to see that Tara is dead.

Well this got dark ridiculously fast.

Yeah It's becoming Darker And Edgier

As I read on the YMMV page.

JRPictures wrote:As I read on the YMMV page.

I feel like I have reality-warping superpowers, now. I wrote something on the YMMV page; IT MUST BE TRUE.

Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:

JRPictures wrote:As I read on the YMMV page.

I feel like I have reality-warping superpowers, now. I wrote something on the YMMV page; IT MUST BE TRUE.

Yeah pretty much.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKQWVcJL ... e=youtu.be
What is written in the calendar?

Victin wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKQWVcJLZTI&feature=youtu.be
What is written in the calendar?

Discussion of the video is happening in the Tara Coulson's case thread over in the Holmes section.

Short answer: too blurry for anyone to read so far, from what know. I can't find that particular bit of the discussion, possibly because it took place in a different thread than the ones I'm looking in.

(There are so many overlaps between sections that the different threads tend to get a bit tangled.)

EDIT: Found it! Twitter conversations thread. So far no answer as to what the writing says.

Because I didn't see any one post this on the forums yets, Bradley updates Tara's blog for the last time.

Yeah I wondered why people didn't notice.

Anyways it's a nice post that helpfully clears up some things and shows a good side to the story.

"Tara Coulson was infinitely stronger and greater than Jennifer Cooney could ever hope to be."

... Can I tell Quixote to give Brad a lime?

Oh, and Brad's made another post.
Doesn't look good.