NeverSlender wrote:I think he gave up on his armour.
Scarab wrote:NeverSlender wrote:I think he gave up on his armour.
Well, damn. I guess we're about to find out what happens when Don Quixote tries to get into a hotel without paying :/
NeverSlender wrote:Scarab wrote:NeverSlender wrote:I think he gave up on his armour.
Well, damn. I guess we're about to find out what happens when Don Quixote tries to get into a hotel without paying :/
Good: He'll end up with somewhere to stay. Bad: It'll be a police cell.
JackAlsworth wrote:I've searched "Tripky Inn" on all of the engines I can think of. I've never heard of it, and it doesn't seem to exist on the internet. (Although Lance's last tweet implies that it's kind of a dump.)
Victin wrote:Just to add the possibility that it isn't a fictional hotel, maybe it's a poor hotel, that's why it's a dump and why there isn't a site for it. But I believe it's indeed a fictional one.
NeverSlender wrote:Victin wrote:Just to add the possibility that it isn't a fictional hotel, maybe it's a poor hotel, that's why it's a dump and why there isn't a site for it. But I believe it's indeed a fictional one.
We decided to use the word fake. Calling it fictional became too confusing.
Victin wrote:NeverSlender wrote:Victin wrote:Just to add the possibility that it isn't a fictional hotel, maybe it's a poor hotel, that's why it's a dump and why there isn't a site for it. But I believe it's indeed a fictional one.
We decided to use the word fake. Calling it fictional became too confusing.
Oh sorry. But just to now, where did it happen?
NeverSlender wrote:Victin wrote:NeverSlender wrote:We decided to use the word fake. Calling it fictional became too confusing.
Oh sorry. But just to now, where did it happen?
What do you mean?
Jeroic9 wrote:Uh oh. I think we may have lost Quixote at the moment.
IslaKariese wrote:Jeroic9 wrote:Uh oh. I think we may have lost Quixote at the moment.
For now. I don't doubt he'll find some other way to reach the internet.
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:And if that doesn't happen, we do have one other option. He did send an e-mail to Holmes earlier today. If we end up losing Quixote for good because of this, we may be meant to direct Holmes to Seattle to help us find him after he finishes his current case. Though I was hoping he would spend some time there searching for Cinderella. But Quixote may have higher priority here.
Sicon112 wrote:WackyMeetsPractical wrote:And if that doesn't happen, we do have one other option. He did send an e-mail to Holmes earlier today. If we end up losing Quixote for good because of this, we may be meant to direct Holmes to Seattle to help us find him after he finishes his current case. Though I was hoping he would spend some time there searching for Cinderella. But Quixote may have higher priority here.
Good thinking. If the New York case is closed before Don manages to contact us, someone should send in a missing persons report and request for investigation to Holmes' site. I probably can do it. I've gotten mostly good responses from him. If anyone else would like to, bring it up and we can decide.
Victin wrote:Can't we just contact Poirot? Holmes is occupied right now.
Goldude wrote:Are there any bodybags in the hotel?
Return to [REFIC'D] Don Quixote
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest