Page 10 of 42
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:05 amby NeverSlender
Sicon112 wrote:NeverSlender wrote:Sicon112 wrote:Apparently, he is of the opinion the Heart Is An Awesome Power. *dodges incoming slaps from the drinking game players*
*Sneaks up behind and kidney punches you for avoiding your punishment*
DRINK!
One day, slendy... one day...
Anyhow, anyone got any theories on how Don gets to Boston, or how WE get him there? We seem to be operating the assumption hat we are going to have a big team up of all the good characters, after all...
The team of fics may not be the best idea. It would basically be a team of Holmes, Poirot and Leeroy Jenkins.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:07 amby Dryunya
Sicon112 wrote:Anyhow, anyone got any theories on how Don gets to Boston, or how WE get him there? We seem to be operating the assumption hat we are going to have a big team up of all the good characters, after all...
I think it would be easier to get everyone else to Boston.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:08 amby Sicon112
NeverSlender wrote:The team of fics may not be the best idea. It would basically be a team of Holmes, Poirot and Leeroy Jenkins.
Which would be hilarious. I fail to see the issue.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:09 amby Dryunya
It will be a problem if Reality Ensues. Who knows.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:11 amby NeverSlender
Sicon112 wrote:NeverSlender wrote:The team of fics may not be the best idea. It would basically be a team of Holmes, Poirot and Leeroy Jenkins.
Which would be hilarious. I fail to see the issue.
One may end up killing the other, out of rage.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:51 pmby WackyMeetsPractical
I skipped ahead a touch. Is this Moriarty fellow honestly meant to be portrayed as the worst human being ever? He's drab and uninteresting.
I'm getting the feeling that the puppet masters are tying to tell us that Moriarty is not going to be involved in this plot. They don't seem to be too impressed with him.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:53 pmby Guyshane
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:I skipped ahead a touch. Is this Moriarty fellow honestly meant to be portrayed as the worst human being ever? He's drab and uninteresting.
I'm getting the feeling that the puppet masters are tying to tell us that Moriarty is not going to be involved in this plot. They don't seem to be too impressed with him.
If thats the case we just got tossed straight back to square one with the whole Aurthur Moore thing
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:55 pmby Victin
Guyshane wrote:WackyMeetsPractical wrote:I skipped ahead a touch. Is this Moriarty fellow honestly meant to be portrayed as the worst human being ever? He's drab and uninteresting.
I'm getting the feeling that the puppet masters are tying to tell us that Moriarty is not going to be involved in this plot. They don't seem to be too impressed with him.
If thats the case we just got tossed straight back to square one with the whole Aurthur Moore thing
Or maybe Arthur Moore is just another evil guy. He doesn't need to be Moriarty.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:56 pmby WackyMeetsPractical
Guyshane wrote:WackyMeetsPractical wrote:I skipped ahead a touch. Is this Moriarty fellow honestly meant to be portrayed as the worst human being ever? He's drab and uninteresting.
I'm getting the feeling that the puppet masters are tying to tell us that Moriarty is not going to be involved in this plot. They don't seem to be too impressed with him.
If thats the case we just got tossed straight back to square one with the whole Aurthur Moore thing
I do believe that Holmes has already rejected the idea of Moriarty being involved in the plot. And if Holmes believes it, who are we to question it?
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:57 pmby Guyshane
Yes but we now don't know what game he's playing, don't know his motives and don't know if he's a real person or fictional escapee
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:02 pmby Adell
Holmes hasn't seen the connection, but if this is a Holmes familiar with Moriarty, Moriarty might have taken precautions not to get involved with Holmes and instead just focus on Poirot. It makes total sense that he'd avoid meeting with Holmes who would recognize him immediately.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:24 pmby Sicon112
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:I skipped ahead a touch. Is this Moriarty fellow honestly meant to be portrayed as the worst human being ever? He's drab and uninteresting.
I'm getting the feeling that the puppet masters are tying to tell us that Moriarty is not going to be involved in this plot. They don't seem to be too impressed with him.
That is exactly what they are saying.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:43 pmby Victin
Sicon112 wrote:WackyMeetsPractical wrote:I skipped ahead a touch. Is this Moriarty fellow honestly meant to be portrayed as the worst human being ever? He's drab and uninteresting.
I'm getting the feeling that the puppet masters are tying to tell us that Moriarty is not going to be involved in this plot. They don't seem to be too impressed with him.
That is exactly what they are saying.
Anyway, I think we could refer to that guy as 'Moriarty', because repeating the same expressions all the time is tiring.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:07 pmby Flitterbie
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:I do believe that Holmes has already rejected the idea of Moriarty being involved in the plot. And if Holmes believes it, who are we to question it?
I think he more rejected it because he didn't want it, more than that he didn't think it likely.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:40 pmby Flitterbie
Guys, I think we're going to have to explain feminism to him soon.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:52 pmby Flitterbie
And now he's watching Sherlock. Has anyone tried getting Holmes to watch that yet?
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:54 pmby Guyshane
Flitterbie wrote:And now he's watching Sherlock. Has anyone tried getting Holmes to watch that yet?
No but not a bad idea
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:57 pmby Sicon112
Guyshane wrote:Flitterbie wrote:And now he's watching Sherlock. Has anyone tried getting Holmes to watch that yet?
No but not a bad idea
Guys... Don is about to flip his sh*t. Not sure about the total content of the movie, but... well... the
wiki article for it includes the word "dominatrix". This is so totally not ending well...
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:58 pmby IslaKariese
Sicon112 wrote:Guys... Don is about to flip his sh*t. Not sure about the total content of the movie, but... well... the
wiki article for it includes the word "dominatrix". This is so totally not ending well...
No. No, it's not.
And there are five other episodes.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:02 pmby Sicon112
IslaKariese wrote:No. No, it's not. And there are five other episodes.
Let me see if I can locate the movie theater he is in and call him an ambulance. I sense an aneurysm coming on... (Not seriously gonna do that, XD)
He will totally freak out and get arrested again for disturbing the peace...
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:06 pmby IslaKariese
Sicon112 wrote:IslaKariese wrote:No. No, it's not. And there are five other episodes.
Let me see if I can locate the movie theater he is in and call him an ambulance. I sense an aneurysm coming on... (Not seriously gonna do that, XD)
He will totally freak out and get arrested again for disturbing the peace...
No, they're episodes. 90 minute long episodes. As in television and less chance of finding him.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:08 pmby Sicon112
IslaKariese wrote:No, they're episodes. 90 minute long episodes. As in television and less chance of finding him.
This will still end in chaos...
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:39 pmby Scarab
This will still end in chaos...
What do you mean END with chaos? I can't remember a time when this was NOT chaos. There's more chaos going on here than at a quantum physicists' stag do.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:53 pmby Guyshane
Scarab wrote:This will still end in chaos...
What do you mean END with chaos? I can't remember a time when this was NOT chaos. There's more chaos going on here than at a quantum physicists' stag do.
And yet were attempting to restore order to the wall. oh sweet bird of irony
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:55 pmby Victin
Guyshane wrote:Scarab wrote:This will still end in chaos...
What do you mean END with chaos? I can't remember a time when this was NOT chaos. There's more chaos going on here than at a quantum physicists' stag do.
And yet were attempting to restore order to the wall. oh sweet bird of irony
Chaos is improbability. And what is more improbable than chaos setting up order?