Twitter Conversations

"Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind."

[Refictionalized 12 Dec 2012]

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby WackyMeetsPractical on Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:42 am

I'm not sure if it was the right choice, but I just told Quixote that Holmes exists, and directed him to his website. Normally, I wouldn't have, but he kept insisting that he didn't exist and even called me delusional. Anyway, it felt like the plot was leading to this. Let's see how he responds.
If everyone would just agree with me, there would never be any problems.
User avatar
WackyMeetsPractical
 
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:35 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby RotavatoR on Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:21 pm

He replied :D
Looks positive, let's motivate him into sending an e-mail.
User avatar
RotavatoR
 
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby WackyMeetsPractical on Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:27 pm

Yes, definitely. It looks like I did make a good choice.
If everyone would just agree with me, there would never be any problems.
User avatar
WackyMeetsPractical
 
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:35 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby WackyMeetsPractical on Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:46 pm

Don Quixote sent his e-mail. What's next? Should we inform him about Poirot? Any of the other characters? Cheshire, maybe? Or should we just focus on giving him more names?
If everyone would just agree with me, there would never be any problems.
User avatar
WackyMeetsPractical
 
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:35 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Dryunya on Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:18 pm

Plot-wise, we should give him a suitable name before the evening. I believe the emails can wait.
I have attempted to suppress my inner hyperspace future gardener crying out against all the injustice I am committing.
User avatar
Dryunya
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:23 am

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Victin on Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:18 pm

How about Wolfgang?
"Well an idiot pokes the thing with his fingers. A scientist gets someone else's fingers."
User avatar
Victin
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:17 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Dryunya on Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:41 pm

Isn't that a German name?
Also, he needs a last name, too.
Double also, I've made a thread for that.
I have attempted to suppress my inner hyperspace future gardener crying out against all the injustice I am committing.
User avatar
Dryunya
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:23 am

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Sicon112 on Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:17 pm

Uh oh... Somehow I get a bad feeling about the way Don described the hotel he is now in...
Normal people are the easiest to manipulate. Too smart and they have an annoying tendency to catch wind of your plans, too dumb and, in the words of a certain pirate, "You can never tell when they are about to do something incredibly...stupid."
User avatar
Sicon112
Meta-Witch Hunter
 
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:07 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Victin on Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:18 pm

Sicon112 wrote:Uh oh... Somehow I get a bad feeling about the way Don described the hotel he is now in...

Me too. What hotel could it be? There is something that I can almost think of... I mean, I guess I know which hotel is that (if it's a fictional one), but I can't remember...
"Well an idiot pokes the thing with his fingers. A scientist gets someone else's fingers."
User avatar
Victin
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:17 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby WackyMeetsPractical on Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:23 pm

Victin wrote:
Sicon112 wrote:Uh oh... Somehow I get a bad feeling about the way Don described the hotel he is now in...

Me too. What hotel could it be? There is something that I can almost think of... I mean, I guess I know which hotel is that (if it's a fictional one), but I can't remember...


Why are we assuming it's a fictional hotel? Why can't it just be a normal hotel with a creepy looking man running it?
If everyone would just agree with me, there would never be any problems.
User avatar
WackyMeetsPractical
 
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:35 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby NeverSlender on Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:25 pm

The hotel sounds a bit Scooby Doo.
Marching on together.
User avatar
NeverSlender
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:30 am
Location: Yorkshire, England

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Victin on Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:28 pm

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:
Victin wrote:
Sicon112 wrote:Uh oh... Somehow I get a bad feeling about the way Don described the hotel he is now in...

Me too. What hotel could it be? There is something that I can almost think of... I mean, I guess I know which hotel is that (if it's a fictional one), but I can't remember...


Why are we assuming it's a fictional hotel? Why can't it just be a normal hotel with a creepy looking man running it?

I'm not assuming, I'm saying that if it were a fictional one, but I suppose we could have only the manager as fictional.
"Well an idiot pokes the thing with his fingers. A scientist gets someone else's fingers."
User avatar
Victin
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:17 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby narrativedilettante on Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:34 pm

I'm assuming the hotel is real. (Or at least, not from the other side of the wall as far as we're concerned.) If Don went for the cheapest accommodations he could find, it's hardly surprising that he's found a hotel with a poor excuse for a bed and a creepy manager.
Never put off until tomorrow what you can put off until the day after.
User avatar
narrativedilettante
Meta-Robin
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:07 am

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Sicon112 on Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:51 pm

Nope, from a meta point of view, the Hotel likely does not exist. I and a few others did a comprehensive search for the hotel name, and no such place exists. So... it's either a way worse place than we thought, he is lying about the name, or it was just a made up name.
Normal people are the easiest to manipulate. Too smart and they have an annoying tendency to catch wind of your plans, too dumb and, in the words of a certain pirate, "You can never tell when they are about to do something incredibly...stupid."
User avatar
Sicon112
Meta-Witch Hunter
 
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:07 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby WackyMeetsPractical on Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:45 pm

Sicon112 wrote:Nope, from a meta point of view, the Hotel likely does not exist. I and a few others did a comprehensive search for the hotel name, and no such place exists. So... it's either a way worse place than we thought, he is lying about the name, or it was just a made up name.


I think the reason is the puppetmasters don't want any of us to pester a real hotel about a fictional character, so they created a hotel for the ARG, but that doesn't mean that the hotel or the manager is fictional, by which I mean, from the other side of the wall. Wow, we need better terminology.
If everyone would just agree with me, there would never be any problems.
User avatar
WackyMeetsPractical
 
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:35 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby JackAlsworth on Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:52 pm

The hotel is fake but not fictional. That's my bet.
User avatar
JackAlsworth
 
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Western Washington State

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby IslaKariese on Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:59 pm

JackAlsworth wrote:The hotel is fake but not fictional. That's my bet.

You know, if we weren't tropers, we wouldn't know the difference between the two. That's why I love us! :D

But anyway, has anyone told him yet that the hotel isn't real? He seems adamant that it is.
The voices in my head tell me that we saved the world. However, they also told me that George Clooney's face is on the dollar bill, so... meh. The voices are more fun, anyway.
User avatar
IslaKariese
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:53 am
Location: Maryland/Virginia

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby NeverSlender on Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:01 pm

IslaKariese wrote:
JackAlsworth wrote:The hotel is fake but not fictional. That's my bet.

You know, if we weren't tropers, we wouldn't know the difference between the two. That's why I love us! :D

But anyway, has anyone told him yet that the hotel isn't real? He seems adamant that it is.


But the hotel is real. It's just... not.
Marching on together.
User avatar
NeverSlender
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:30 am
Location: Yorkshire, England

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby narrativedilettante on Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:05 pm

"Fake but not fictional" seems like a good assessment. The question is: Is this a hotel that was made up for the ARG, or has Don stumbled into some sort of nefarious plot involving a creepy man pretending to run a hotel?
Never put off until tomorrow what you can put off until the day after.
User avatar
narrativedilettante
Meta-Robin
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:07 am

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby NeverSlender on Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:06 pm

narrativedilettante wrote:"Fake but not fictional" seems like a good assessment. The question is: Is this a hotel that was made up for the ARG, or has Don stumbled into some sort of nefarious plot involving a creepy man pretending to run a hotel?


The first one I think. The second one is just too Scooby Doo.
Marching on together.
User avatar
NeverSlender
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:30 am
Location: Yorkshire, England

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby RotavatoR on Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:13 pm

Are you thinking what I'm thinking?
...
Nah :P

But there's definately something up with that guy, if only for the fact that Don has posted three tweets about him. Is he sleeping now?
User avatar
RotavatoR
 
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Pixelmage on Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:13 pm

Well... It could be that just didn't want us calling to a real hotel to ask about... Lance Chevalier? But it's kind of stupid to bring this up and not have anything of importance happen... So, what's the worst thing that could happen now? Because it might just be that coming our way: Everything's been too smooth recently... Holmes-Poirot reunion, not much trouble with the new characters... It's... too peaceful right now.
"Atashi no tameni, shinde kureru?"
User avatar
Pixelmage
 
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:08 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Sicon112 on Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:19 pm

Pixelmage wrote:Well... It could be that just didn't want us calling to a real hotel to ask about... Lance Chevalier? But it's kind of stupid to bring this up and not have anything of importance happen... So, what's the worst thing that could happen now? Because it might just be that coming our way: Everything's been too smooth recently... Holmes-Poirot reunion, not much trouble with the new characters... It's... too peaceful right now.


Summary: It's quiet... too quiet.

(In a few hours, we are probably going to be saying, "And now suddenly it's too loud. I liked it better when it was quiet.")
Normal people are the easiest to manipulate. Too smart and they have an annoying tendency to catch wind of your plans, too dumb and, in the words of a certain pirate, "You can never tell when they are about to do something incredibly...stupid."
User avatar
Sicon112
Meta-Witch Hunter
 
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:07 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby NeverSlender on Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:19 pm

Pixelmage wrote:Well... It could be that just didn't want us calling to a real hotel to ask about... Lance Chevalier? But it's kind of stupid to bring this up and not have anything of importance happen... So, what's the worst thing that could happen now? Because it might just be that coming our way: Everything's been too smooth recently... Holmes-Poirot reunion, not much trouble with the new characters... It's... too peaceful right now.


I get what you mean. If you think about it, nothing's actually happened yet. Its just been characters being introduced with individual stories. The overall plot hasn't moved, pretty much since the grave announcement.
Marching on together.
User avatar
NeverSlender
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:30 am
Location: Yorkshire, England

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby RotavatoR on Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:22 pm

...So what you are saying is that, in almost a whole month, we haven't even gotten past the Prologue?

This thing is huge. I think we can safely get rid of the term "mini-ARG".
User avatar
RotavatoR
 
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:25 pm

PreviousNext

Return to [REFIC'D] Don Quixote

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest