Twitter Conversations

"Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind."

[Refictionalized 12 Dec 2012]

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby NeverSlender on Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:24 pm

RotavatoR wrote:...So what you are saying is that, in almost a whole month, we haven't even gotten past the Prologue?

This thing is huge. I think we can safely get rid of the term "mini-ARG".


More like the title page.
Marching on together.
User avatar
NeverSlender
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:30 am
Location: Yorkshire, England

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Flitterbie on Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:15 pm

User avatar
Flitterbie
 
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:18 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Sicon112 on Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:16 pm



Dude, no he didn't. He got robbed. Saw it coming.
Normal people are the easiest to manipulate. Too smart and they have an annoying tendency to catch wind of your plans, too dumb and, in the words of a certain pirate, "You can never tell when they are about to do something incredibly...stupid."
User avatar
Sicon112
Meta-Witch Hunter
 
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:07 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Flitterbie on Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:17 pm

Sicon112 wrote:


Dude, no he didn't. He got robbed. Saw it coming.


I meant he was no longer in possession of his phone. Same difference.
User avatar
Flitterbie
 
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:18 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Flitterbie on Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:19 pm

Wait, what if the THIEF is a fictional character too?

Not in a meta sense, I mean...
User avatar
Flitterbie
 
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:18 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Jeroic9 on Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:20 pm

Flitterbie wrote:Wait, what if the THIEF is a fictional character too?

Not in a meta sense, I mean...


Either way, I'm playing the Meta's theme song. It's fitting for whenever I talk about this stuff.
I wrote a book. Adding to the far side of the wall.
User avatar
Jeroic9
 
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:43 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby IslaKariese on Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:21 pm

Is the phone technically stolen if the one who now has it is the one it belongs to in the first place?
The voices in my head tell me that we saved the world. However, they also told me that George Clooney's face is on the dollar bill, so... meh. The voices are more fun, anyway.
User avatar
IslaKariese
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:53 am
Location: Maryland/Virginia

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Flitterbie on Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:22 pm

IslaKariese wrote:Is the phone technically stolen if the one who now has it is the one it belongs to in the first place?


We have no way of knowing if this is that person.
User avatar
Flitterbie
 
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:18 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby IslaKariese on Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:23 pm

Flitterbie wrote:
IslaKariese wrote:Is the phone technically stolen if the one who now has it is the one it belongs to in the first place?

We have no way of knowing if this is that person.

He said so in response to the tweet.
The voices in my head tell me that we saved the world. However, they also told me that George Clooney's face is on the dollar bill, so... meh. The voices are more fun, anyway.
User avatar
IslaKariese
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:53 am
Location: Maryland/Virginia

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Flitterbie on Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:25 pm

IslaKariese wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:
IslaKariese wrote:Is the phone technically stolen if the one who now has it is the one it belongs to in the first place?

We have no way of knowing if this is that person.

He said so in response to the tweet.


I took that more to mean "It's my phone NOW," personally.
User avatar
Flitterbie
 
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:18 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby RotavatoR on Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:27 pm

IslaKariese wrote:Is the phone technically stolen if the one who now has it is the one it belongs to in the first place?

Technically not, it's been taken back. I sense trouble if Don doesn't have connection with us. I've no idea how long he will last but we have to solve this asap.
What I'm not getting is how that guy got his phone back, unless he is the owner of the hotel, which seems unlikely.
User avatar
RotavatoR
 
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby JackAlsworth on Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:45 am

Taking odds on how long it takes for Lance to either A) steal the phone back, or B) steal another one.
User avatar
JackAlsworth
 
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Western Washington State

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Dryunya on Fri Oct 12, 2012 2:22 am

So, he wandered into the Wretched Hive. Good job, Quixote. :evil:
I don't think we can do anything about it. I say we wait for some time, and if he doesn't get online, we contact our detectives.
The other option would be to somehow trace the phone through the twitter account, but
  1. that would require a technomage,
  2. we still wouldn't be able to do anything about it - do we tell the police to catch the guy who robbed Don Quixote?
  3. meta-wise, that plan will only lead us to the puppetmaster. :gurt:

I'm open to suggestions if I missed something.
I have attempted to suppress my inner hyperspace future gardener crying out against all the injustice I am committing.
User avatar
Dryunya
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:23 am

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Sicon112 on Fri Oct 12, 2012 7:19 am

Dryunya wrote:So, he wandered into the Wretched Hive. Good job, Quixote. :evil:
I don't think we can do anything about it. I say we wait for some time, and if he doesn't get online, we contact our detectives.
The other option would be to somehow trace the phone through the twitter account, but
  1. that would require a technomage,
  2. we still wouldn't be able to do anything about it - do we tell the police to catch the guy who robbed Don Quixote?
  3. meta-wise, that plan will only lead us to the puppetmaster. :gurt:

I'm open to suggestions if I missed something.


Well, I might be able to find their IP, but since they know we suspect them of stealing the phone, they may be going through a proxy or proxies and on top of that, it's a portable device so the IP wouldn't help me that much anyway. I'd probably be able to tell that they were in Seattle, which we already know.
Normal people are the easiest to manipulate. Too smart and they have an annoying tendency to catch wind of your plans, too dumb and, in the words of a certain pirate, "You can never tell when they are about to do something incredibly...stupid."
User avatar
Sicon112
Meta-Witch Hunter
 
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:07 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby RotavatoR on Fri Oct 12, 2012 7:59 am

If this guy is the rightful owner of the phone, maybe we could do something with the pictures of the woman Quixote found on it. If he took them in secret, if he doesn't know the woman, then maybe we can use that to blackmail him.

Just a thought :gurt:
User avatar
RotavatoR
 
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Sicon112 on Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:03 am

RotavatoR wrote:If this guy is the rightful owner of the phone, maybe we could do something with the pictures of the woman Quixote found on it. If he took them in secret, if he doesn't know the woman, then maybe we can use that to blackmail him.

Just a thought :gurt:


But Quixote never told us much about the photos, just that they existed. I already considered blackmail, but we don't have enough info on who the owner is (and therefore who to threaten to send the photos too) or what or who the photos are of and whether or not they were perfectly normal. We could try bluffing, but I think it's almost certain our bluff would be called in this case, seeing as he can see the entire conversation between Quixote and us.
Normal people are the easiest to manipulate. Too smart and they have an annoying tendency to catch wind of your plans, too dumb and, in the words of a certain pirate, "You can never tell when they are about to do something incredibly...stupid."
User avatar
Sicon112
Meta-Witch Hunter
 
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:07 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby RotavatoR on Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:35 am

Why don't we put one of the two detectives on this case? We're probably not gonna get any further without any clues, and if I understand you correctly, even tracing the phone would not help a lot.

Meanwhile, we have two of the most famous fictional detectives who are in America as we speak, and who have set up websites specifically for their detective services. I don't know why the PM's would create those websites if not for situations like this :?
User avatar
RotavatoR
 
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Victin on Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:00 am

RotavatoR wrote:Why don't we put one of the two detectives on this case? We're probably not gonna get any further without any clues, and if I understand you correctly, even tracing the phone would not help a lot.

Meanwhile, we have two of the most famous fictional detectives who are in America as we speak, and who have set up websites specifically for their detective services. I don't know why the PM's would create those websites if not for situations like this :?

I agree. We could start with Poirot and after with Holmes. It would solve this problem and make them get together.
"Well an idiot pokes the thing with his fingers. A scientist gets someone else's fingers."
User avatar
Victin
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:17 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Flitterbie on Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:39 pm

User avatar
Flitterbie
 
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:18 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Victin on Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:42 pm

"Well an idiot pokes the thing with his fingers. A scientist gets someone else's fingers."
User avatar
Victin
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:17 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby NeverSlender on Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:43 pm

Flitterbie wrote:Called it.


Anyone wanna bet on that hotel having a dungeon?
Marching on together.
User avatar
NeverSlender
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:30 am
Location: Yorkshire, England

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Guyshane on Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:45 pm

NeverSlender wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:Called it.


Anyone wanna bet on that hotel having a dungeon?

While that would be narratively convent I kinda doubt it
I say we nuke it from orbit...its the only way to be sure.
User avatar
Guyshane
 
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:45 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby NeverSlender on Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:46 pm

Guyshane wrote:
NeverSlender wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:Called it.


Anyone wanna bet on that hotel having a dungeon?

While that would be narratively convent I kinda doubt it


But it would be hilarious.
Marching on together.
User avatar
NeverSlender
 
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:30 am
Location: Yorkshire, England

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby Flitterbie on Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:48 pm

NeverSlender wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:Called it.


Anyone wanna bet on that hotel having a dungeon?


Well, if it didn't, it will.
User avatar
Flitterbie
 
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:18 pm

Re: Twitter Conversations

Postby JackAlsworth on Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:15 pm

Don Quixote wrote:I ask you not to fear if you don't hear from me for some time today, as, well... the cur has to regain consciousness before he can talk.


That must've been... quite a scuffle.
User avatar
JackAlsworth
 
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:40 pm
Location: Western Washington State

PreviousNext

Return to [REFIC'D] Don Quixote

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests