Watch the Footage archive

Posted: **Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:24 pm**

RotavatoR wrote:...So what you are saying is that, in almost a whole month, we haven't even gotten past the Prologue?

This thing is huge. I think we can safely get rid of the term "mini-ARG".

More like the title page.

Posted: **Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:15 pm**

I think Quixote may have lost his phone.

Posted: **Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:16 pm**

Flitterbie wrote:I think Quixote may have lost his phone.

Dude, no he didn't. He got robbed. Saw it coming.

Posted: **Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:17 pm**

Sicon112 wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:I think Quixote may have lost his phone.

Dude, no he didn't. He got robbed. Saw it coming.

I meant he was no longer in possession of his phone. Same difference.

Posted: **Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:19 pm**

Wait, what if the THIEF is a fictional character too?

Not in a meta sense, I mean...

Posted: **Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:20 pm**

Flitterbie wrote:Wait, what if the THIEF is a fictional character too?

Not in a meta sense, I mean...

Either way, I'm playing the Meta's theme song. It's fitting for whenever I talk about this stuff.

Posted: **Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:21 pm**

Is the phone technically stolen if the one who now has it is the one it belongs to in the first place?

Posted: **Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:22 pm**

IslaKariese wrote:Is the phone technically stolen if the one who now has it is the one it belongs to in the first place?

We have no way of knowing if this is that person.

Posted: **Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:23 pm**

Flitterbie wrote:
IslaKariese wrote:Is the phone technically stolen if the one who now has it is the one it belongs to in the first place?

We have no way of knowing if this is that person.

He said so in response to the tweet.

Posted: **Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:25 pm**

IslaKariese wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:
IslaKariese wrote:Is the phone technically stolen if the one who now has it is the one it belongs to in the first place?

We have no way of knowing if this is that person.

He said so in response to the tweet.

I took that more to mean "It's my phone NOW," personally.

Posted: **Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:27 pm**

IslaKariese wrote:Is the phone technically stolen if the one who now has it is the one it belongs to in the first place?

Technically not, it's been taken back. I sense trouble if Don doesn't have connection with us. I've no idea how long he will last but we have to solve this asap.
What I'm not getting is how that guy got his phone back, unless he is the owner of the hotel, which seems unlikely.

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:45 am**

Taking odds on how long it takes for Lance to either A) steal the phone back, or B) steal another one.

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 2:22 am**

So, he wandered into the Wretched Hive. Good job, Quixote. :evil:

I don't think we can do anything about it. I say we wait for some time, and if he doesn't get online, we contact our detectives.
The other option would be to somehow trace the phone through the twitter account, but

that would require a technomage,
we still wouldn't be able to do anything about it - do we tell the police to catch the guy who robbed Don Quixote?
meta-wise, that plan will only lead us to the puppetmaster.

I'm open to suggestions if I missed something.

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 7:19 am**

Dryunya wrote:So, he wandered into the Wretched Hive. Good job, Quixote.
I don't think we can do anything about it. I say we wait for some time, and if he doesn't get online, we contact our detectives.
The other option would be to somehow trace the phone through the twitter account, but
that would require a technomage,
we still wouldn't be able to do anything about it - do we tell the police to catch the guy who robbed Don Quixote?
meta-wise, that plan will only lead us to the puppetmaster.

I'm open to suggestions if I missed something.

Well, I might be able to find their IP, but since they know we suspect them of stealing the phone, they may be going through a proxy or proxies and on top of that, it's a portable device so the IP wouldn't help me that much anyway. I'd probably be able to tell that they were in Seattle, which we already know.

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 7:59 am**

If this guy is the rightful owner of the phone, maybe we could do something with the pictures of the woman Quixote found on it. If he took them in secret, if he doesn't know the woman, then maybe we can use that to blackmail him.

Just a thought :gurt:

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:03 am**

RotavatoR wrote:If this guy is the rightful owner of the phone, maybe we could do something with the pictures of the woman Quixote found on it. If he took them in secret, if he doesn't know the woman, then maybe we can use that to blackmail him.

Just a thought

But Quixote never told us much about the photos, just that they existed. I already considered blackmail, but we don't have enough info on who the owner is (and therefore who to threaten to send the photos too) or what or who the photos are of and whether or not they were perfectly normal. We could try bluffing, but I think it's almost certain our bluff would be called in this case, seeing as he can see the entire conversation between Quixote and us.

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:35 am**

Why don't we put one of the two detectives on this case? We're probably not gonna get any further without any clues, and if I understand you correctly, even tracing the phone would not help a lot.

Meanwhile, we have two of the most famous fictional detectives who are in America as we speak, and who have set up websites specifically for their detective services. I don't know why the PM's would create those websites if not for situations like this

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:00 am**

RotavatoR wrote:Why don't we put one of the two detectives on this case? We're probably not gonna get any further without any clues, and if I understand you correctly, even tracing the phone would not help a lot.

Meanwhile, we have two of the most famous fictional detectives who are in America as we speak, and who have set up websites specifically for their detective services. I don't know why the PM's would create those websites if not for situations like this

I agree. We could start with Poirot and after with Holmes. It would solve this problem and make them get together.

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:39 pm**

Called it.

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:42 pm**

Flitterbie wrote:Called it.

And it seems that we have trouble.

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:43 pm**

Flitterbie wrote:Called it.

Anyone wanna bet on that hotel having a dungeon?

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:45 pm**

NeverSlender wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:Called it.

Anyone wanna bet on that hotel having a dungeon?

While that would be narratively convent I kinda doubt it

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:46 pm**

Guyshane wrote:
NeverSlender wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:Called it.

Anyone wanna bet on that hotel having a dungeon?

While that would be narratively convent I kinda doubt it

But it would be hilarious.

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:48 pm**

NeverSlender wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:Called it.

Anyone wanna bet on that hotel having a dungeon?

Well, if it didn't, it will.

Posted: **Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:15 pm**

Don Quixote wrote:I ask you not to fear if you don't hear from me for some time today, as, well... the cur has to regain consciousness before he can talk.

That must've been... quite a scuffle.

Watch the Footage archive

Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations

Re: Twitter Conversations