Page 27 of 42
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:37 pmby WackyMeetsPractical
NeverSlender wrote:Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:Oh, dear. I'm of two minds: We should either comment on her blog (in small numbers, so as not to freak her out) vouching for him, but asking her to play nice with our crazy friend-- or we should go in totally the other direction.
Tara Coulson wrote:I’m considering having him investigated
What are the chances he'd be investigated by one of our friendly neigbourhood fictional detectives? It might be a good thing to have Holmes or Poirot interact with him-- if nothing else, it would probably cause another echo, giving us/Mr. A more info.
Maybe we should encourage her to have him investigated, and suggest to her the website of a couple investigators of our acquaintance.
"Dear Tara,
While that knight is completely bat shit crazy, he's a good man and I think you can trust him. If you still have doubts, Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot are more than willing to have a look at him for you."
Am I good to roll with this?
Let's see, she thinks the guy claiming to be Don Quixote is insane, so referring her to two detectives claiming to be Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot sounds like the most sensible thing to do.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:39 pmby Victin
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Let's see, she thinks the guy claiming to be Don Quixote is insane, so referring her to two detectives claiming to be Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot sounds like the most sensible thing to do.
If she asks, tell her it's just two guys taking the names of these characters to sound good, and lik her to their sites.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:40 pmby NeverSlender
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Let's see, she thinks the guy claiming to be Don Quixote is insane, so referring her to two detectives claiming to be Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot sounds like the most sensible thing to do.
I'm glad you agree. If anyone asks, you gave me permission to post it.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:48 pmby Dryunya
What's this I don't even.
I've been messaging her for some time now, by the way. She never approves the posts, but she reacted to somebody's comment, so at least she reads them.
If you are willing to tell her everything... Well, it's not like I can stop you. But I have no idea why we should.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:49 pmby Qara-Xuan Zenith
I would say don't say "Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot". Say "these guys" with a link to their professional sites.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:49 pmby NeverSlender
Dryunya wrote:What's this I don't even.
I've been messaging her for some time now, by the way. She never approves the posts, but she reacted to somebody's comment, so at least she reads them.
If you are willing to tell her everything... Well, it's not like I can stop you. But I have no idea why we should.
Lulz?
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:50 pmby Dryunya
Holyshithowcouldweforget! Tara has basically CONFIRMED that Mann is Kenneth Tripky!
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:52 pmby NeverSlender
Dryunya wrote:Holyshithowcouldweforget! Tara has basically CONFIRMED that Mann is Kenneth Tripky!
Should we have noted that? It's not like we didn't guess last week.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:57 pmby Dryunya
But now it's almost solid evidence! That's... not really getting us anywhere, but at least may be useful if we are going to retell his story to Tara, or something.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:04 pmby WackyMeetsPractical
Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:I would say don't say "Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot". Say "these guys" with a link to their professional sites.
Except they have their names on their professional sites. She'd discard them as jokes immediately.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:05 pmby Victin
Dryunya wrote:Holyshithowcouldweforget! Tara has basically CONFIRMED that Mann is Kenneth Tripky!
Where?
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:09 pmby Dryunya
Tara Coulson wrote:So, the crazy old guy? The one I mentioned in my last post? He had pictures of me on his phone. Pictures taken by Mann.
And we all remember that the phone apparently belongs to Tripky.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:14 pmby Qara-Xuan Zenith
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Except they have their names on their professional sites. She'd discard them as jokes immediately.
Actually, all they have is "Holmes Investigations" and "Hercule Poirot: Little Grey Cells at Work". They, especially the former, imply a detective agency named after a famous fictional detective, not some crackpot who actually thinks he's Holmes or Poirot.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:16 pmby NeverSlender
Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Except they have their names on their professional sites. She'd discard them as jokes immediately.
Actually, all they have is "Holmes Investigations" and "Hercule Poirot: Little Grey Cells at Work". They, especially the former, imply a detective agency named after a famous fictional detective, not some crackpot who actually thinks he's Holmes or Poirot.
She's with a man claiming to be a Knight of Burger. Holmes Investigations shouldn't be too much of a stretch.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:19 pmby Dryunya
By the way, now that it's important: do the detectives now use their real names in public, or stick to their fake ones?
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:24 pmby Qara-Xuan Zenith
Best way to find out: ask the therapist the name of the detective she engaged. (Maybe we can tell her we're in need of a good investigator ourselves, and want to know who she used.)
Or I guess we could ask Holmes or Poirot ourselves, explaining that we want to refer them to someone who won't get the whole fictional stuff.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 8:26 pmby Dryunya
That's the right course of action... But, to be honest, I got tired of interacting with them through blogs. They take an eternity to respond.
Do it yourself.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:03 pmby Qara-Xuan Zenith
All right. Done. (Awaiting moderation.)
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:37 pmby Sicon112
Posted a comment telling her that Don got in the paper a while back, and to look at that if she doesn't believe us. For some indecipherable reason, the GMs do NOT want us posting on Tara's blog, so none of my comments have appeared, same as you guys. Usually most of my comments go through right away...
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:47 pmby Pixelmage
Sicon112 wrote:Posted a comment telling her that Don got in the paper a while back, and to look at that if she doesn't believe us. For some indecipherable reason, the GMs do NOT want us posting on Tara's blog, so none of my comments have appeared, same as you guys. Usually most of my comments go through right away...
Ingame
maybe the blog was hacked again and Tripky does not want our comments to reach her... Possible?
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:50 pmby Sicon112
Pixelmage wrote:Sicon112 wrote:Posted a comment telling her that Don got in the paper a while back, and to look at that if she doesn't believe us. For some indecipherable reason, the GMs do NOT want us posting on Tara's blog, so none of my comments have appeared, same as you guys. Usually most of my comments go through right away...
Ingame
maybe the blog was hacked again and Tripky does not want our comments to reach her... Possible?
Doubt it. Been like this since we found it.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Sun Oct 21, 2012 10:26 pmby Dryunya
For some reason, I've been dismissing it as a character quirk.
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:16 pmby WackyMeetsPractical
So, Don Quixote needs to learn a spell. Interesting turn of events.
I hope it wasn't beyond my bounds, but I've already responded, cryptically referencing the witch has potentially being able to help. Should we continue down this road?
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:29 pmby Qara-Xuan Zenith
I'm not exactly sure what Quixote means by "sealing" the troll, but what if one of us offers to "teach him" a (made up) "permanent binding spell" on the troll, guaranteed to permanently prevent it from motion?
Re: Twitter Conversations
Posted:
Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:30 pmby WackyMeetsPractical
Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:I'm not exactly sure what Quixote means by "sealing" the troll, but what if one of us offers to "teach him" a (made up) "permanent binding spell" on the troll, guaranteed to permanently prevent it from motion?
I was thinking along those same lines. What have you in mind?