Watch the Footage archive

That's it. I give up. Deanna finally broke my brain.

I mean, the only person we KNOW of who fits that description is Metaneko... who absolutely CAN NOT be Deanna.

Honestly, if there's some sort of pathetic Untwist about Deanna's identity, I will MUTILATE the GMs with a SPORK.

Or... she's with fictionalthreat!

Now everything makes sense!

(Plus, meta, this was supposed to help us discover him, since we only got it before through Sequence Breaking)

I'm thinking Deanna turns out to be the Big Bad of this whole thing. We'll have to send all the fictionals back just to save them from her!

narrativedilettante wrote:I'm thinking Deanna turns out to be the Big Bad of this whole thing.

Quite possible, but... in some non-obvious way, probably. Unless there really is a whole order of people who kill fictionals... In which case Jester Has A Point.

And if she is the one who broke the wall (that would automatically make her the Big Bad)... WHY!?!?
She confuses the hell out of me.

I'm actually thinking of making a little fancomic about her. Not that I'm a fan, but dammit.

Oh, and one more thing. I thought of trying to provoke her, and told Quixote to relay my statement that she can't kill Mr. A. Perhaps that will force her to... to what?

I think I'll make a new thread about her later.

...WMG: TheJester IS a puppetmaster.

Oh, and double-post because Don Quixote. He is going to find Tripky tonight. And Deanna says this. Mind you, she said it before Quixote announced his tonight crusade.

Something terrible is going to happen, but I have absolutely no idea what. She kills Quixote? That makes no sense, both meta- and plot-wise.

narrativedilettante wrote:I'm thinking Deanna turns out to be the Big Bad of this whole thing. We'll have to send all the fictionals back just to save them from her!

Probably more like the Dragon, if her comment about her teacher is any indication. I suspected this last night, and was going to post... Then I fell asleep. FML.

We still don't know how the wall broke, though.

Judging by fictionalthreat's ramblings, s/he didn't break it, merely saw the signs and found out about cAke's efforts to work on it. Meaning that if Deanna is with him/her, she's in it to 'fix' the Wall too.

...

You all know what emoticon we're missing here, I'll not reiterate.

Dryunya wrote:Oh, and double-post because Don Quixote. He is going to find Tripky tonight. And Deanna says this. Mind you, she said it before Quixote announced his tonight crusade.

Something terrible is going to happen, but I have absolutely no idea what. She kills Quixote? That makes no sense, both meta- and plot-wise.

Yes, something bad is definitely going to happen, and I'm concerned it will involve a fictional death. And it doesn't matter which fictional, any of them dying's a bad thing. We should take some kind of action. I'm alerting Mr. A, and asking what we should do.

Quixote needs questions

Go on the twitter and help.

Edit: New tweet: https://twitter.com/TheTrueQuixote/stat ... 9561194497

This Deanna is really beginning to irk me.

You know... This is getting a bit dangerous... We have no precedent to know the effects of character death. They already proved that they are capable of killing... So... This meeting is starting to seem like a bad idea to me.

Pixelmage wrote:You know... This is getting a bit dangerous... We have no precedent to know the effects of character death. They already proved that they are capable of killing... So... This meeting is starting to seem like a bad idea to me.

I'm trying to talk him out of it. But I know it's not going to work. Our only hope now is that Holmes will tell us what to do.

Edit: I was right. It didn't work.

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:

Pixelmage wrote:You know... This is getting a bit dangerous... We have no precedent to know the effects of character death. They already proved that they are capable of killing... So... This meeting is starting to seem like a bad idea to me.

I'm trying to talk him out of it. But I know it's not going to work. Our only hope now is that Holmes will tell us what to do.

Has anyone asked for his advice?

Pixelmage wrote:You know... This is getting a bit dangerous... We have no precedent to know the effects of character death. They already proved that they are capable of killing... So... This meeting is starting to seem like a bad idea to me.

Well, yes I think a number of us have probably come to the conclusion that going to meet a mystery woman who seems to know a great deal about the fictional characters AND a recent murder, without any reapons, armor, or backup, might NOT be the best of all possible ideas.

Sicon112 wrote:Has anyone asked for his advice?

I suggest somebody tries.

Sicon112 wrote:

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:

Pixelmage wrote:You know... This is getting a bit dangerous... We have no precedent to know the effects of character death. They already proved that they are capable of killing... So... This meeting is starting to seem like a bad idea to me.

I'm trying to talk him out of it. But I know it's not going to work. Our only hope now is that Holmes will tell us what to do.

Has anyone asked for his advice?

I thought you were doing that.

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:I thought you were doing that.

Don't have time ATM plus I don't want to ask him anything extra for now. He is still sore about earlier.

Alright, I commented. I hope I gave him all the information he'll need. I was kind of panicky.

Panic usually means urgency, so let's hope.

Tripky's gonna die. I can just feel it.

What.

I mean, this doesn't feel like a massive surprise, they did seem to be leading up to it, but...

We still don't have any sort of motivation for Deanna. And that's bothering me.

If Deanna was behind the hacking of Tara's blog, I'm guessing she also helped Sweeney hack the therapist's blog.

Called it. It's the Untwist.

And I called everything again. Sometimes I hate being right... There goes our lead. Don had better hang in there.