Page 36 of 42

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:09 am
by Qara-Xuan Zenith
A google search on him gave me nothing.
So... I got nothing, people. sorry.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:15 am
by WackyMeetsPractical
There might be a good possibility that he's working with Deanna. After all, she said she stole the phone from Tripky, and then dropped it, and then Quixote "coincidentally" found it. But now we know Deanna has a special interest in fictionals, meaning that she probably planted it for Quixote to find. Which could also meant that she planted Braddock to stand nearby and offer assistance in using it. Yeah, that kind of makes sense.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:32 am
by Qara-Xuan Zenith
Someone warn him maybe that Foreman is probably in cahoots with Deanna.
That should put him on his guard, at least, though it certainly won't deter him from going.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:55 am
by agoraoptera
Okay, so Deanna did a Riddle Time sort of thing. She asked three questions.
Question 1:Why, of all possible aliases, did I choose a surname like Hackins?
Dryu answered it: Because she hacks into blogs. ("Specifically Tara Coulson's", in Deanna's own words.)
Question 2: Is my real name Faith Barker, Jennifer Cooney, or Amanda Hoffman? Hint: Cross and nails.
I answered it: Jennifer Cooney. (Cross and nails = JC)
Question 3: It is my reason for doing what I do. It can bestow Immortality. It's what you'll find in the suit man's void.
Donqey got this: Nothing. ("I TOTALLY DID THAT ON PURPOSE")
"As a reward I'll tell you how I know Brad. He is the only one who ever believed me when I was younger, believed the things I said."
Oh, and when Dryu commented that she's batshit crazy, Deanna (or Jennifer) said "You misinterpret the meaning", which could mean that she's trying to destroy reality.

:(

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 7:01 am
by Dryunya
UPD: Dammit, I didn't see there's a whole unread page. :evil:

My WMG: he's Deanna's childhood friend (see my post at her thread) who was somehow involved. Considering that Deanna had probably planted Tripky's phone intentionally, his having been nearby is not a coincidence. I think he may be trying to stop her, or make her plan play along his own. Or something.
Either way, I think meeting him is somewhat safe (see her thread again).

My note with the mod hat on: don't forget that this thread is to chronicle Quixote's misadventures. Speculations about Deanna Who should go to the corresponding thread.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:42 pm
by Scarab
I'm thinking it would be a very good idea at this point to TRY and get in contact with the owner of fictionalthreat. I mean, he's got crazyass ideas, but he also does not condones Deanna's methods AND he can clearly contact her, or maybe he could help us find more answers? I don't think we should dismiss him as a potential source of info just because he's batshit.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:45 pm
by Sicon112
Scarab wrote:I'm thinking it would be a very good idea at this point tp TRY and get in contact with the owner of fictionalthreat. I mean, he's got crazyass ideas, but he also DOES NOT condone Deanna's methods AND he can clearly contact her, or maybe he could help us find more answers? I don't think we should dismiss him as a potential source of info just because he's batshit.


Might wanna fix that.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:55 pm
by Scarab
Sicon112 wrote:
Scarab wrote:I'm thinking it would be a very good idea at this point tp TRY and get in contact with the owner of fictionalthreat. I mean, he's got crazyass ideas, but he also DOES NOT condone Deanna's methods AND he can clearly contact her, or maybe he could help us find more answers? I don't think we should dismiss him as a potential source of info just because he's batshit.


Might wanna fix that.


Done, thanks.
I mixed up condone and condemn again :oops:

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:58 pm
by Sicon112
Not a problem. Grammar Nazi AWAY!!!

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:01 pm
by Qara-Xuan Zenith
Walking Tachsbane strikes again!

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:12 pm
by Scarab
Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:Walking Tachsbane strikes again!


There are days when I wish I was born normal.

Then I take the pills, and everything is okay again.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:45 pm
by WackyMeetsPractical
Quixote has met with Braddock

The meeting was a fake.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:48 pm
by Victin
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Quixote has met with Braddock

The meeting was a fake.

What?

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:50 pm
by WackyMeetsPractical
Victin wrote:
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Quixote has met with Braddock

The meeting was a fake.

What?


I'm guessing that Deanna had originally set it up. But Brad is taking matters into his own hands.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:50 pm
by Victin
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:
Victin wrote:
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Quixote has met with Braddock

The meeting was a fake.

What?


I'm guessing that Deanna had originally set it up. But Brad is taking matters into his own hands.

Ok, got it, but who is Brad?

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:58 pm
by WackyMeetsPractical
Victin wrote:
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:
Victin wrote:What?


I'm guessing that Deanna had originally set it up. But Brad is taking matters into his own hands.

Ok, got it, but who is Brad?


Brad is Braddock Foreman. He's the man that taught Quixote how to use his Techno several months back.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:00 pm
by Victin
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:
Victin wrote:
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:I'm guessing that Deanna had originally set it up. But Brad is taking matters into his own hands.

Ok, got it, but who is Brad?


Brad is Braddock Foreman. He's the man that taught Quixote how to use his Techno several months back.

I said he was going to be important. But I forgot him myself :(

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:11 pm
by WackyMeetsPractical
Quixote just posted this.

TheTrueQuixote wrote:My friends, please cease harassing others who share the name 'Jennifer Cooney', or those you suspect might be her Twitter account.


The Don has spoken.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:28 pm
by Genndy Oda C.O.G.
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Quixote just posted this.

TheTrueQuixote wrote:My friends, please cease harassing others who share the name 'Jennifer Cooney', or those you suspect might be her Twitter account.


The Don has spoken.

And I shall heed his suggestion.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:34 pm
by Qara-Xuan Zenith
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Quixote just posted this.

TheTrueQuixote wrote:My friends, please cease harassing others who share the name 'Jennifer Cooney', or those you suspect might be her Twitter account.


The Don has spoken.


Well, so much for my and Dryu's plan.
(That was all us. Oh, well.)

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:40 pm
by WackyMeetsPractical
And now for something sad: https://twitter.com/TheTrueQuixote/stat ... 9926850560

Tara, you will be missed.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 7:09 pm
by Scarab
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:And now for something sad: https://twitter.com/TheTrueQuixote/stat ... 9926850560

Tara, you will be missed.


I think we knew how she felt.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:56 am
by Qara-Xuan Zenith
Once again: The Untwist. We called this one.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:03 pm
by Dryunya
Spawned Tara's calendar into a separate thread.

Re: Twitter Conversations

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 7:29 pm
by narrativedilettante
Brad still can't watch the video. I'm guessing Jennifer Cooney is somehow responsible for this technical problem.