
Zup wrote:So the final hacked message said that if we sympathize, we will see them when the clock strikes :45. Is that a reference to 12:45 am EST (0:45)? And see them where? At the Pheeble site? Is there a riddle in that then?
Sicon112 wrote:Zup wrote:So the final hacked message said that if we sympathize, we will see them when the clock strikes :45. Is that a reference to 12:45 am EST (0:45)? And see them where? At the Pheeble site? Is there a riddle in that then?
It was posted on the main page of WTF about 40 minutes past the hour. They were referring to the 45 minute mark of the hour the message was posted. At that exactly time (I checked seconds before) the intro6 archive was uploaded.
Scarab wrote:The Cheshire cat made a reference to 'Four who wait in the shadows' which are probably these guys... maybe we could talk to him about finding who they are (although good luck getting anything coherent out of him.)
IslaKariese wrote:Scarab wrote:The Cheshire cat made a reference to 'Four who wait in the shadows' which are probably these guys... maybe we could talk to him about finding who they are (although good luck getting anything coherent out of him.)
Do you think they're fictional villains?
Scarab wrote:I think at least ONE of them is. Either that or he's running from something in his own world that is so terrible hehas resorted to villainy to escape it. Or possibly both. That person, I suspect, is Oberon.
The others... I don't know. They don't seem like very nice people but there's a difference between being a malicious character and being an out and out villain...
Pixelmage wrote:Scarab wrote:I think at least ONE of them is. Either that or he's running from something in his own world that is so terrible hehas resorted to villainy to escape it. Or possibly both. That person, I suspect, is Oberon.
The others... I don't know. They don't seem like very nice people but there's a difference between being a malicious character and being an out and out villain...
Oberon. King of Fairies. If the name suits him, it means he identifies with that character... Do we know any Oberon-Expy? Though I'm being too literal to find something... I'm fairly certain that there's some sort of Theme Naming or Meaningful Name being used.

Adell wrote:Getting their side of the story is fine, but I'd much rather confront Mr.A right now. We've been arguing for weeks now about whether sending these characters back is ACTUAL NECESSARY to close the wall. If it's not, a lot of the metaguards seem to want to let some of these characters stay. Now while I'm not sure I agree, I at least want to know why sending all of them back is so necessary. If it isn't, and Mr.A just wants us to, I might be more willing to compromise with these Cabal guys.
Scarab wrote:Yeah, I think I pretty much agree with that. Question is, how on earth do we talk Mister A into giving us some ACTUAL information for a change? It's really not fair to have kept us hanging for so long...
I mean, we're assuming he DOES know what's going on here, but I'm not certain they know HOW to fix the wall at all.
Pixelmage wrote:Scarab wrote:Yeah, I think I pretty much agree with that. Question is, how on earth do we talk Mister A into giving us some ACTUAL information for a change? It's really not fair to have kept us hanging for so long...
I mean, we're assuming he DOES know what's going on here, but I'm not certain they know HOW to fix the wall at all.
First thing: We ask. I'm not sure we can do anything else. From his answer we decide how to move... I'm already on it.
NeverSlender wrote:Be polite at first. If you don't get an answer then, well, demand one.
Pixelmage wrote:NeverSlender wrote:Be polite at first. If you don't get an answer then, well, demand one.
Twitter's character limit doesn't leave much room for that. I just flat out asked why we have to send them back if they pose no threat. Not that I mean to be rude.
Mr. A, feel free to post a wall of text here as a response. We really hope for a satisfactory answer.
Pixelmage wrote:NeverSlender wrote:Be polite at first. If you don't get an answer then, well, demand one.
Twitter's character limit doesn't leave much room for that. I just flat out asked why we have to send them back if they pose no threat. Not that I mean to be rude.
Mr. A, feel free to post a wall of text here as a response. We really hope for a satisfactory answer.
Scarab wrote:Thing is, do we have any idea what to do if we DON'T get a satisfactory answer? I mean, I don't trust this Cabal very much, however justified their reasoning may (and I do stress, MAY) be...
Pixelmage wrote:Scarab wrote:Thing is, do we have any idea what to do if we DON'T get a satisfactory answer? I mean, I don't trust this Cabal very much, however justified their reasoning may (and I do stress, MAY) be...
Well, while we wait... I was thinking.
The Cabal 4 fit the Woobie Archetype.
They talk about how awful it is to be stuck in their stories, yet, a protagonist such as Julliet wants nothing more than to go back. The ones that don't are the ones who go through hell on their stories. That could limit our possible character pool.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest