Watch the Footage archive

Dryunya wrote:I think we should archive all this extended session somewhere. It is a pain to piece it together on twitter, and it's a valuable piece of EC canon. Now I know that if you pee in the void, it will fall endlessly, and that Mr. Administrator is naked all the time. Make me unsee it.

Since I'm going to review it later, I can get on with it... If you tell me where to store it.

I guess you could (re)make the Mr. A is an a- I mean, I guess you could make a thread to store and discuss Mr. A's Twitter conversations, like we do with the characters. Not the best way to store the information but still... It's better than twitter.

I was thinking about a TV Tropes page, maybe. Anyway, it has to be converted to plain text first. After that, I could dump it here, but I don't like the idea of creating an info post, only to bury it under our speculations.

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Well, it was fun, and informative.
Any one more willing to trust Mr. A?

Not sure, I'll have to go through all those questions I just meticulously copied to a photoshop document (darn lack of twitter, capture-paste was faster) later and see, but I'm sure we all appreciate the AMA.

I'll say this, though, he's certainly not the stick in the mud I assumed he was

Scarab wrote:

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Well, it was fun, and informative.
Any one more willing to trust Mr. A?

Not sure, I'll have to go through all those questions I just meticulously copied to a photoshop document (darn lack of twitter, capture-paste was faster) later and see, but I'm sure we all appreciate the AMA.

I'll say this, though, he's certainly not the stick in the mud I assumed he was

Or at least, parts of him aren't. Remember Madame Administrator?

IslaKariese wrote:

Scarab wrote:

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Well, it was fun, and informative.
Any one more willing to trust Mr. A?

Not sure, I'll have to go through all those questions I just meticulously copied to a photoshop document (darn lack of twitter, capture-paste was faster) later and see, but I'm sure we all appreciate the AMA.

I'll say this, though, he's certainly not the stick in the mud I assumed he was

Or at least, parts of him aren't. Remember Madame Administrator?

Oh yeah she was awesome (Didn't she get disintergrated? I really wanted her to hang around.)

Scarab wrote:Oh yeah she was awesome (Didn't she get disintergrated? I really wanted her to hang around.)

I think ...maybe. Or maybe not, we'll see hopefully.

OK, I'm done with the Q&A. It is now good ol' plain text.
It will hang here for a month. Before that time, we should host it somewhere. Until then, check if I missed something.

That guy is actually funny when he's not being all hush-hush.

(To the ninja!JRPictures: I was absent for hours, and just as I came back and made a minute-long post, you just had to ninja me. )

Dryunya wrote:OK, I'm done with the Q&A. It is now good ol' plain text.
It will hang here for a month. Before that time, we should host it somewhere. Until then, check if I missed something.

That guy is actually funny when he's not being all hush-hush.

(To the ninja!JRPictures: I was absent for hours, and just as I came back and made a minute-long post, you just had to ninja me. )

Just so you know, he said he would answer the REST tomorrow, so this ain't over. I would help, but it's 1:35 AM here.

EDIT: BTW, Dryu, did you notice the confirmation of our theory?

Sicon112 wrote:EDIT: BTW, Dryu, did you notice the confirmation of our theory?

Which one? He answered quite a lot.

Double BTW: Do you that with all that information we can classify him as a non-hostile Humanoid Abomination?

UPD: We forgot to ask the most important thing when it comes to clones: whether or not he makes out with himself.

Dryunya wrote:

Sicon112 wrote:EDIT: BTW, Dryu, did you notice the confirmation of our theory?

Which one? He answered quite a lot.

Double BTW: Do you that with all that information we can classify him as a non-hostile Humanoid Abomination?

For the moment, it seems non-hostile. What I meant was that he confirmed, in different points, a HUGE amount of the meta-verse theory. I'll go over and make some analysis of his responses to smooth out some bits in the morning, but I think most of the fundamental bases are confirmed, even my "Mr. A can't write fiction" thing that started the whole thread.

Also, what do you think the GM's said when they saw us coming up with that stuff? I would have loved to see their reactions.

Sicon112 wrote:I think most of the fundamental bases are confirmed, even my "Mr. A can't write fiction" thing that started the whole thread.

This bit is good to be clarified, but It makes no sense - even Mr. A admits it. Oh well. That means the second version was more correct about this. I'll make an update when I get some decent sleep... That will probably be somewhere around tomorrow PST evening. And I don't think I'll get to write the Medusa story, either...

Sicon112 wrote:Also, what do you think the GM's said when they saw us coming up with that stuff?

Sure, Why Not?

UPD: I've just realized that I forgot to confirm the Blueprint theory. It was very important! Stupid me! Stupid! "Whooo's giving who amnesia?"
Let's hope he answers it during the next session. It will be a follow-up, but maybe we'll persuade him.

Don't have a twitter myself so couldn't get involved but you know, I thin k a lot of the things I thought about this guy either aren't true, or at least aren't the way I thought they were.

I'm not fully ready to trust him yet, but it seems to me a lot of the things he's said that concerned me may just be the result of poor communication skills between humans and... well, whatever he us. When he said 'WE DON'T CARE WITH YOU TRUST US' what he actually meant was "WHETHER OR NOT YOU TRUST US IS IRRELEVANT TO THE PROBLEM AT HAND". The reason he hasn't been communicating us is because they were focussed on research and didn't REALISE that we normal human beings required the kind of input he wasn't giving.

One question I sent left to be answered.

Wait wait wait. Mr. A your message says your over the daily limit for tweets. The daily tweet limit is one thousand tweets. You only have 374 tweets.

IT WOULD SEEM WE RAN AGROUND ON A SEMI-HOURLY INTERVAL. PLEASE SEND YOUR FEEDBACK TO TWITTER'S SO-CALLED "ADMINISTRATORS".

Mr. Administrator wrote:

Screen shot 2012-10-17 at 4.49.17 AM.png

IT WOULD SEEM WE RAN AGROUND ON A SEMI-HOURLY INTERVAL. PLEASE SEND YOUR FEEDBACK TO TWITTER'S SO-CALLED "ADMINISTRATORS".

Mr. A, do you have any news about the Kabals?

Have they been spotted anywhere? Were the Spam Threads relevant to the hackings that happened here? Is there anything big that we must know right now?

(Also notices the Twitter Limit)

...
...
...

Really? A limit on Twitter messages? THAT'S JUST CRAZY

Mr. Administrator wrote:

Screen shot 2012-10-17 at 4.49.17 AM.png

IT WOULD SEEM WE RAN AGROUND ON A SEMI-HOURLY INTERVAL. PLEASE SEND YOUR FEEDBACK TO TWITTER'S SO-CALLED "ADMINISTRATORS".

Jesus twitter is crap. And I have plenty of questions for when you start again.

Idea: What if one of the members of the Kabal is Benvolio? He would know Romeo's backstory and was Romeo's relative in the play. Or maybe it's Mercutio? He was, mind you, a good pal of Romeo's in the Original Play, and would love to see him return. He would also fight others, like he did with Tybalt in Act 3, to protect Romeo.

Noticed this on a listen-through of the messages on Joan's phone--one of the Cabal is female. She left the "found your notebook" message.

Wysp wrote:Noticed this on a listen-through of the messages on Joan's phone--one of the Cabal is female. She left the "found your notebook" message.

Ok. This is new.

(Looks at poster)


...
...
...

Wysp wrote:Noticed this on a listen-through of the messages on Joan's phone--one of the Cabal is female. She left the "found your notebook" message.

Yes, we've discussed that already. It's also likely that the four of them are shown on the Shards Cover page.

Wysp wrote:Noticed this on a listen-through of the messages on Joan's phone--one of the Cabal is female. She left the "found your notebook" message.

Not necessarily. It's most likely a woman, but it could also be a small child.

NeverSlender wrote:

Wysp wrote:Noticed this on a listen-through of the messages on Joan's phone--one of the Cabal is female. She left the "found your notebook" message.

Not necessarily. It's most likely a woman, but it could also be a small child.

Why would a small child join a deadly gang?

The Finch wrote:

NeverSlender wrote:

Wysp wrote:Noticed this on a listen-through of the messages on Joan's phone--one of the Cabal is female. She left the "found your notebook" message.

Not necessarily. It's most likely a woman, but it could also be a small child.

Why would a small child join a deadly gang?

Come on, how many fictional creepy children are there?

The Finch wrote:Why would a small child join a deadly gang?

You haven't heard of Baby Doll from Batman:TAS have you?