Watch the Footage archive

Pixelmage wrote:

Sicon112 wrote:I've tried a significant amount of varying archive codes, but so far not a lot of luck. I'll discount the blogs then and look for character named archives.

We have no access to the Log's metadata (computer terms metadata). So there's no way to know when they create the chatlogs... My guess is that they enable the archives right before allowing us to reach it... So, there was no westwitch when I tried earlier, but now that Holmes found that letter, there could be a westwitch log (didn't retest it yet - no change, westwitch invalid). If so, trying to bruteforce a archive password won't work at all.

Pixelmage wrote:

Sicon112 wrote:I've tried a significant amount of varying archive codes, but so far not a lot of luck. I'll discount the blogs then and look for character named archives.

We have no access to the Log's metadata (computer terms metadata). So there's no way to know when they create the chatlogs... My guess is that they enable the archives right before allowing us to reach it... So, there was no westwitch when I tried earlier, but now that Holmes found that letter, there could be a westwitch log (didn't retest it yet - no change, westwitch invalid). If so, trying to bruteforce a archive password won't work at all.

Tohrinha wrote:Also, the passwords are case-sensitive. Although so far they've only been lowercase; they may continue that pattern.

Tohrinha wrote:Also, the passwords are case-sensitive. Although so far they've only been lowercase; they may continue that pattern.

<div id="chatContainer">
<div id="chatTopBar" class="rounded">session: mindsandmatters</div>
<div id="chatLineHolder" ></div>
<!-- <div id="chatUsers" class="rounded"></div> -->
<div id="chatBottomBar" class="rounded">
<div class="tip"></div>
</div>
</div>

Pixelmage wrote:

Tohrinha wrote:Also, the passwords are case-sensitive. Although so far they've only been lowercase; they may continue that pattern.

Didn't try that... Because trying capitalizations is a pain.

Someone here has an injector and know how to use it?

<div id="chatContainer">
<div id="chatTopBar" class="rounded">session: mindsandmatters</div>
<div id="chatLineHolder" ></div>
<!-- <div id="chatUsers" class="rounded"></div> -->
<div id="chatBottomBar" class="rounded">
<div class="tip"></div>
</div>
</div>

See that code (from the mindsandmatters archive source code)? This line:
<!-- <div id="chatUsers" class="rounded"></div> -->
Is an invisible panel. What in blazes is in this pannel, I can't know. But if someoe knows how to GreaseMonkey or something their way into removing the <!-- --> comment tags to force the pannel to be visible, it could reveal something.
It's been ages since I toyed with that stuff, I don't have the tools to do it now, and I'm not ever sure if I can do it without some serious time studying the newer tools...

IslaKariese wrote:*hisses through her teeth* Computer stuff. Headache. Oh god so much headache.

Pixelmage wrote:

Tohrinha wrote:Also, the passwords are case-sensitive. Although so far they've only been lowercase; they may continue that pattern.

Didn't try that... Because trying capitalizations is a pain.

Someone here has an injector and know how to use it?

<div id="chatContainer">
<div id="chatTopBar" class="rounded">session: mindsandmatters</div>
<div id="chatLineHolder" ></div>
<!-- <div id="chatUsers" class="rounded"></div> -->
<div id="chatBottomBar" class="rounded">
<div class="tip"></div>
</div>
</div>

See that code (from the mindsandmatters archive source code)? This line:
<!-- <div id="chatUsers" class="rounded"></div> -->
Is an invisible panel. What in blazes is in this pannel, I can't know. But if someoe knows how to GreaseMonkey or something their way into removing the <!-- --> comment tags to force the pannel to be visible, it could reveal something.
It's been ages since I toyed with that stuff, I don't have the tools to do it now, and I'm not ever sure if I can do it without some serious time studying the newer tools...

NeverSlender wrote:Done.

Pixelmage wrote:

NeverSlender wrote:Done.

Empty username list. T_T
That's depressing.

An idea, pheeble is not their hangout. They set the site up to use as a showcase for whatever they wanted us to know. The place they actually talk in is another site altogether. Too much work, very unrealistic, but would explain why we can't get a single lead out of the supposed chatroom.

Oh well... To be honest I was hoping it would be a control panel of some sort...
Awesome work anyway, Never! On a positive note, it's one false lead out of the way.

NeverSlender wrote:I think there could be more to the site. The source code says there is a logout button for chat user a.

Sicon112 wrote:

NeverSlender wrote:I think there could be more to the site. The source code says there is a logout button for chat user a.

Now that's interesting... There any other log out options? Probably not, since this seems to be archived and run by Angelus, meaning only he would have the log button on that page...

NeverSlender wrote:

Sicon112 wrote:

NeverSlender wrote:I think there could be more to the site. The source code says there is a logout button for chat user a.

Now that's interesting... There any other log out options? Probably not, since this seems to be archived and run by Angelus, meaning only he would have the log button on that page...

No. There is a mention of user p, but all it says is he hasn't uploaded any chat archives.

Dryunya wrote:Am I missing something? I see nothing of importance in that image.

Pixelmage wrote:

NeverSlender wrote:Done.

Empty username list. T_T
That's depressing.

I can almost physically feel my Meta Badass Decay.

Dryunya wrote:

Pixelmage wrote:

NeverSlender wrote:Done.

Empty username list. T_T
That's depressing.

I figured you saw something special there, now that you are talking about usernames and uploads?

I can almost physically feel my Meta Badass Decay.

Zup wrote:That would make sense. Is San Francisco really cold right now?

Zup wrote:That would make sense. Is San Francisco really cold right now?