Watch the Footage archive

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Anyway, we're getting a lot of these chats. We should probably be compiling a list for easy access.

All of them are on the timeline.

Zup wrote:So we have Angelus as the Phantom, Don Juan (brilliant deduction) as Pyramus, and Morgana as Oberon. Steinitz is very likely Moriarty or perhaps another smarmy villain type.

Thanks

Why do they want to be found?

Tohrinha wrote:Why do they want to be found?

Because they know we can't do anything.

JackAlsworth wrote:*reads through*

...

They wanted us to find this.

This was part of their plan.

Saw it coming. They just confirmed everything. Now we sit back and follow the trail of breadcrumbs to their real site, which is where the fun begins.

Zup wrote:So we have Angelus as the Phantom, Don Juan (brilliant deduction) as Pyramus, and Morgana as Oberon. Steinitz is very likely Moriarty or perhaps another smarmy villain type.

*WMG* Steinitz could very well be the Cheshire Cat. *WMG*

I don't know that they wanted all of these old posts to be found, but it sounded like they wanted to see who was on their side. Maybe they're...judging us?

NeverSlender wrote:

Tohrinha wrote:Why do they want to be found?

Because they know we can't do anything.

Pretty much. Like Slender pointed out, they're giving us outdated information. That is supposed to look into their trail, instead of what they are doing now. Keep us busy with things we can't change so that we can't mess with their plans that can still be derailed.

EdwardTheAwesome wrote:I don't know that they wanted all of these old posts to be found, but it sounded like they wanted to see who was on their side. Maybe they're...judging us?

Also possible. But I think it's unlikely. If they want our sympathy and support, they would've let some way to contact them.

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:

Zup wrote:So we have Angelus as the Phantom, Don Juan (brilliant deduction) as Pyramus, and Morgana as Oberon. Steinitz is very likely Moriarty or perhaps another smarmy villain type.

*WMG* Steinitz could very well be the Cheshire Cat. *WMG*

And that WMG is helped by the fact they wanted to be found.

JackAlsworth wrote:

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Anyway, we're getting a lot of these chats. We should probably be compiling a list for easy access.

All of them are on the timeline.

Not quite what I meant. Now they're just get lost in the timeline. Perhaps in the Useful Links thread?

Pixelmage wrote:

EdwardTheAwesome wrote:I don't know that they wanted all of these old posts to be found, but it sounded like they wanted to see who was on their side. Maybe they're...judging us?

Also possible. But I think it's unlikely. If they want our sympathy and support, they would've let some way to contact them.

They could still be judging. Who knows, they may try to join the forum at some point. That would be weird if they did...

EdwardTheAwesome wrote:

Pixelmage wrote:

EdwardTheAwesome wrote:I don't know that they wanted all of these old posts to be found, but it sounded like they wanted to see who was on their side. Maybe they're...judging us?

Also possible. But I think it's unlikely. If they want our sympathy and support, they would've let some way to contact them.

They could still be judging. Who knows, they may try to join the forum at some point. That would be weird if they did...

That would be the easiest way for them to talk to us. Either that or they'll let us access their site.

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:

JackAlsworth wrote:All of them are on the timeline.

Not quite what I meant. Now they're just get lost in the timeline. Perhaps in the Useful Links thread?

It's easier to find stuff now that it's sorted by date, but that's a good idea anyway. Working on it now.

JackAlsworth wrote:

WackyMeetsPractical wrote:

JackAlsworth wrote:All of them are on the timeline.

Not quite what I meant. Now they're just get lost in the timeline. Perhaps in the Useful Links thread?

It's easier to find stuff now that it's sorted by date, but that's a good idea anyway. Working on it now.

I'll get Joe to make a post sometime today. If I can find him...he's been more and more difficult to get in touch with these days. It's really annoying.

EdwardTheAwesome wrote:They could still be judging. Who knows, they may try to join the forum at some point. That would be weird if they did...

That's their safest plan, after all. But they should have done so already. What if we register blank accounts with their names just because? ^^

But, why not contact us yet? Why lead us to information we could use aganist them later? Are they playing the "show my cards as a show of good faith"?

Put the pheeble archives on the Useful Links thread.

JackAlsworth wrote:Put the pheeble archives on the Useful Links thread.

Waaaaaiiiit
Who edited my post?!?!?!

This might just be their chat client. These chats don't make it seem like they wanted those particular chats be found, honestly.

EdwardTheAwesome wrote:This might just be their chat client. These chats don't make it seem like they wanted those particular chats be found, honestly.

I think there's more to pheeble. I think the name has something to do with it. The site is registered as Ph Ee Ble.

Victin wrote:Waaaaaiiiit
Who edited my post?!?!?!

I can do stuff like that, like how I can update Adell's What We Know posts.

Speaking of which, the Cabal one needs some work.

JackAlsworth wrote:

Victin wrote:Waaaaaiiiit
Who edited my post?!?!?!

I can do stuff like that, like how I can update Adell's What We Know posts.

Speaking of which, the Cabal one needs some work.

Can we please call them the Kabals?

The Finch wrote:

JackAlsworth wrote:

Victin wrote:Waaaaaiiiit
Who edited my post?!?!?!

I can do stuff like that, like how I can update Adell's What We Know posts.

Speaking of which, the Cabal one needs some work.

Can we please call them the Kabals?

How about no?

EdwardTheAwesome wrote:This might just be their chat client. These chats don't make it seem like they wanted those particular chats be found, honestly.

If so, how do they access the active chatroom? I brougth this up a few times already, but, as long as we don't understand how Angelus allowed the others to find and talk to him, we can't actually expect that this is really their main hub. Especially because all we can access are named logs.

A chatroom would not have segments from the chat log saved as names acording to the theme without manual imput, therefore, the information we access must be deliberate. Otherwise it makes no sense.

The Finch wrote:Can we please call them the Kabals?

Why exactly? If that's a reference, I don't get it...