I'll go ahead and post the transcripts of my discussions.
Tohrinha wrote:Hello Morgana,
I am Tohrinha. I'm a rather quiet person on the forums, but I have been following the train of events, and I must admit -- I'm rather unsure about the actions we have taken recently.
I'd like to explore your view of events more. I cannot guarantee that I will agree (how can I, with such limited information), but I'm open to hearing you out.
Please email me back at this address.
Thank you,
Tohrinha Dasteme
Morgan wrote:Dearest Tohrinha,
Thank you for reaching out to us. As I have told some of the others, we are happy to answer any questions if they will help you understand us better.
Best wishes,
Morgan
Tohrinha wrote:Morgan,
Thank you for replying to me.
As a scientist, I am curious as to how you were able to interact with the wall piece currently in your possession. Our data thus far contradicts this. If you could clear this up, I would be very grateful.
This next question is more to the point of why I am contacting you. You make a valid point about the metaguards' deception. We have manipulated in order to ease the fictionals' passage, first from their world into ours, then to return them to the other side of the wall. What I do not see is how straightforward malice, such as the Cabal has exhibited -- threatening Miss Lawson, for one example -- is preferable to a gentle deceit. In an ideal world, of course, neither would be necessary; I dislike lying and would rather avoid it. However, if I must choose between, what does your history show me that is more desirable than that of the metaguards?
Respectfully,
Tohrinha Dasteme
Tohrinha wrote:Morgan,
Please forgive the split email.
A new question has occurred to me. You have succeeded in having Peter Pan arrested, protecting him from the danger he was unknowingly entering. However, now that the danger is past, why do you not step in again? Kidnapping is a serious charge in our country, and the way this trial is proceeding, Pan could spend several years in jail. This is not exactly the stay that we would like him to have, for however long he is in this world.
If at all possible, I would appreciate it if you could help Pan. Your search for the wall pieces surely cannot consume all of your resources?
My aim with this is only to help Pan; it is not related to the core of my previous email. I hope you agree.
Respectfully,
Tohrinha Dasteme
Morgan wrote:Dearest Tohrinha,
I believe I answered the question about the wall piece in a previous email to one of your fellow Metaguards. Here is what I had said: "The wall pieces are not harmful to fictionals as far as I am aware. Anything I have to say about the nature of Holmes' illness would be mere conjecture, I am sorry to say."
I do not believe that I said that your actions were more or less desirable than ours. If I did, I meant to say that they are more or less equal. We are both afraid of what will happen to us if things are left unchecked, and we act in ways that are firmly in our own best interest.
That is not to say that I think you are bad people. It is not to say that I think the Cabal is comprised of bad people either. I just believe we are doing what we are compelled to, what we feel we must, in order to save ourselves and those we care about.
I acknowledge that we have done wrong. As I said in the chat, we are trying to correct what we can.
Morgan
Tohrinha wrote:Morgan,
I apologize for misinterpreting you. Also, I fear I appeared rather antagonistic in my previous email. If so, this was not my intention.
I'd like to ask for clarification on one of your points. You state that we fear what will happen to us if events are left unchecked. I am well aware of what this means for me; what for you? Is it the possibility of returning to an unfavorable setting should Mr. Administrator's plans go unimpeded?
Also, I have read your correspondence with other metaguards. In your email to Blurred_9L, you mention this world fleshing out your characters. I am afraid my philosophy seems to be at odds with yours. From what I have gleaned, and what theories we have formed, the interaction between fiction and our world is closer to that of a window, showing a low-dimensional scene from another world, rather than one of creation. Therefore, even before you came to this world, your character was fully developed; all aspects simply did not show in our fiction. However, you are implying that this world is not just changing you, but creating this greater dimension of character. Perhaps you can help reconcile these views?
Respectfully,
Tohrinha Dasteme
Morgan wrote:Dearest Tohrinha,
We are no longer able to take control in the Pan case. The lawyer we found is not as easily controlled as we would have hoped. He has a perfect record, apparently, and would do anything to keep it that way.
However, I also acknowledged in the chat that we would not step in when it came to refictionalizing those who truly wish to be sent back. Pan's second echo was just revealed, according to your forums. We think that, given time, all the fictionals here will find their life improved as they become fleshed out by reality… but we cannot make that choice for them.
Morgan