Mr. Administrator wrote:THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE. WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE AN ADMINISTRATOR ON THESE FORUMS WHEN THE CHANCE WAS THERE. WE WOULD HAVE SILENCED THE CLOYING OF THE CABAL, INSTEAD OF FALLING PREY TO IT.
WE REQUEST THAT YOU ONLY USE THAT EMAIL TO TELL THEM THEY ARE VERMIN, AND THAT THEY WILL BE PUSHED BEYOND THE WALL. THEY CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO STAY. DO NOT FORGET THAT YOUR REALITY IS POTENTIALLY AT STAKE HERE. THEY WILL PLEAD AND THEY WILL PRY, BUT NOTHING IS WORTH THAT PRICE.
WE HAVE SENT THIS EMAIL. FEEL FREE TO USE IT AS A TEMPLATE:DEAR MS. FEY,
WE HATE YOU. YOU ARE THE WORST. YOUR VILE DECISIONS SHALL BE PUNISHED. YOUR WICKEDNESS WILL BE MET WITH JUSTICE. YOUR CHOICES WILL RETURN TO HAUNT YOU. YOUR GOLDFISH WILL DIE FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER.
WE HATE YOU. WE HATE YOU. WE HATE YOU.
Mr. Administrator wrote:
DEAR MS. FEY,
WE HATE YOU. YOU ARE THE WORST. YOUR VILE DECISIONS SHALL BE PUNISHED. YOUR WICKEDNESS WILL BE MET WITH JUSTICE. YOUR CHOICES WILL RETURN TO HAUNT YOU. YOUR GOLDFISH WILL DIE FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER.
WE HATE YOU. WE HATE YOU. WE HATE YOU.
JackAlsworth wrote:I'm sorry, I got here late, but it just has to be said:Mr. Administrator wrote:
DEAR MS. FEY,
WE HATE YOU. YOU ARE THE WORST. YOUR VILE DECISIONS SHALL BE PUNISHED. YOUR WICKEDNESS WILL BE MET WITH JUSTICE. YOUR CHOICES WILL RETURN TO HAUNT YOU. YOUR GOLDFISH WILL DIE FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER.
WE HATE YOU. WE HATE YOU. WE HATE YOU.
NOOOOOOOOO!!! Not the goldfish!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sicon112 wrote:All of my fish die for no reason whatsoever without Mr. A's help. Seriously, I bought this really nice tank and equipment, but whenever fish got in there, they would die inexplicably within a short time. I did everything I was supposed to, but contrived coincidences came up and boom, dead fish.
Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:Sicon112 wrote:All of my fish die for no reason whatsoever without Mr. A's help. Seriously, I bought this really nice tank and equipment, but whenever fish got in there, they would die inexplicably within a short time. I did everything I was supposed to, but contrived coincidences came up and boom, dead fish.
*glomps Sicon to comfort him about dead fish* It could be worse. My cousins used to keep fish, until one of their fish, which was not supposed to be a carnivorous fish, ATE all the others, got really fat, and then died, to all indications, of loneliness. Which it had brought upon itself.
Uh... Back on-topic...
So am I the only one who's gotten replies from Morgan? (Also, I repeat, out of combining respect for her wishes and our need to stay united as a tram, please come to me in private chat in the chatroom for information on her second letter to me. I don't want to betray anyone's confidences.)
Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:So am I the only one who's gotten replies from Morgan? (Also, I repeat, out of combining respect for her wishes and our need to stay united as a tram, please come to me in private chat in the chatroom for information on her second letter to me. I don't want to betray anyone's confidences.)
H22 wrote:On your email, Scarab:
I think it is pretty much perfect. The reason she calls herself Morgan, by the way, is because it is an original form of her name.
Sicon112 wrote:I would like to point out, Scarab, that with a little further work, the Cabal may actually buy into the idea of letting us care for the fragments for a bit. After all, Mr. A has them NOW, so letting us get them cannot be worse than letting them stay where they are, and if that is the only way we cooperate, then they do get SOME gain out of that situation. Even if, in the worst case scenario (for them) we give them back to A, they are no worse than they were, and they have been moved, so A has less time to hide and secure them. Plus, they are less safe in our possession than guarded by A's agents, so it is possible for the Cabal to steal them.
It's all about how you phrase the question.Also, yes, I know the Cabal are reading this. Even if I AM admittedly trying to persuade them to take this path, they should A) expect that of me, and B) realize that the points I make are true anyhow, so it's a perfectly valid option.
Mr Administrator wrote:THE WALL PIECE WILL MERGE BACK INTO THE WALL IF REMOVED FROM THE PROTECTIONS WE PLACED AROUND IT. A PHYSICAL SHELL WILL REMAIN, BUT THE CABAL WILL BE THAT MUCH CLOSER TO THEIR GOAL.
Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:I know this is for email discussion, but it directly relates to what Morgana suggested to Scarab.
I floated the idea to A, and he told me EXACTLY why that's not a viable option:Mr Administrator wrote:THE WALL PIECE WILL MERGE BACK INTO THE WALL IF REMOVED FROM THE PROTECTIONS WE PLACED AROUND IT. A PHYSICAL SHELL WILL REMAIN, BUT THE CABAL WILL BE THAT MUCH CLOSER TO THEIR GOAL.
He also confirmed, in response to Pixel's query, that the piece taken by the Cabal has already re-merged with the Wall.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest