WackyMeetsPractical wrote:Okay, I'm finally all caught up and ready to give this matter some serious thought.
I'm really excited this is Frankenstein's monster. Frankenstein is the one book represented in this ARG that I actually read all the way through, so I feel really in my element with this guy. And everything I've read in his blog so far seems to fit with the character, so I agree with this analysis.
I really don't think he's cabal, not that I don't think he would sympathize with their cause, because obviously he would have no reason to want to return, but his personality simply doesn't match any of the cabal members. Pyramus is confirmed to be a lady's man, and Adam could barely get one woman to talk with him. Everyone else is simply too confident to be Adam. I'm fairly certain he's non-cabal.
As for how to interact with him, it may be best that we don't bombard him with too many comments at once. He seems very timid and may not be comfortable with too much attention. So maybe we stick with just the two that have already commented, and maybe let that number grow gradually through time.
Scarab wrote:I agree, looking at it now perhaps he wasnt a Cabal member at all and him handing a CV to the witch was just... sheer coinscidence.
We're still thinking on that alternative to sending them back plan, right?
Zup wrote:I love this character, and I'm SO glad he's the one from the book. Gotta love that Milton-speak!I hope he becomes a force for good here, without his father around to screw things up.
Oh, and I have a guess now about that creepy skeleton faced guy in the comic. I think it's dear old Adam hisself.
Sicon112 wrote:Zup wrote:I love this character, and I'm SO glad he's the one from the book. Gotta love that Milton-speak!I hope he becomes a force for good here, without his father around to screw things up.
Oh, and I have a guess now about that creepy skeleton faced guy in the comic. I think it's dear old Adam hisself.
Yea, I'd rather have the book one around myself. Though to be honest, he never really helped his own situation in the story. Sure, he tried to for a while at first, but after that he became a little nuts. It was never all Frankenstien's fault. They were both really responsible for how things turned out. It was one of those things where if the characters sat down and talked it out, it all would have ended better.
Zup wrote:Yes, exactly, I just feel that the book-monster was extremely sympathetic. In a lot of ways, he was an allegory for mankind, so we're supposed to feel that way. But yeah, he did kinda go overboard, didn't he? WoobieDestroyerofWorlds.
Victin wrote:Wait... Do you think that Victor could have passed throught the Wall too?
Victin wrote:Wait... Do you think that Victor could have passed throught the Wall too?
EDIT: Also, do you think that we could send him to Joan?
Victin wrote:kay, so, what's his twitter?
Victin wrote:kay, so, what's his twitter?
narrativedilettante wrote:Victin wrote:kay, so, what's his twitter?
He claims to have deleted his Twitter account because he wasn't good at pithy statements.
EDIT: Ninja'd.
JackAlsworth wrote:I'm trying to compose a What We Know for Adam, and I'm wondering - have we figured out where, geographically, he's located? I can't find it in the blog, but I'm not sure if that's because he hasn't said, or because I'm skipping over it.
NeverSlender wrote:JackAlsworth wrote:I'm trying to compose a What We Know for Adam, and I'm wondering - have we figured out where, geographically, he's located? I can't find it in the blog, but I'm not sure if that's because he hasn't said, or because I'm skipping over it.
Pretty sure he mentions he's in Chicago.
NeverSlender wrote:JackAlsworth wrote:I'm trying to compose a What We Know for Adam, and I'm wondering - have we figured out where, geographically, he's located? I can't find it in the blog, but I'm not sure if that's because he hasn't said, or because I'm skipping over it.
Pretty sure he mentions he's in Chicago.
The Finch wrote:God, I have to go to Chicago, don't I?
Sicon112 wrote:OK, I thought we made this clear that we wouldn't swamp him with comments right off. You guys phrased it OK, though, and had some interesting ideas, so I think we should be OK. Could you warn us next time?
eli_gone_crazy wrote:Sicon112 wrote:OK, I thought we made this clear that we wouldn't swamp him with comments right off. You guys phrased it OK, though, and had some interesting ideas, so I think we should be OK. Could you warn us next time?
NO.
ok, yeah maybe.
Return to [REFIC'D] Adam Frankenstein
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest