Page 13 of 14
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Wed Nov 21, 2012 11:07 pm
by Genndy Oda C.O.G.
Ah, Ace Attorney. The closest thing most people have to knowing actual court procedure.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:10 am
by Sicon112
OK, so we should really probably use this information somehow to help out Pan. I'm not sure it would gain us anything to link the echo to the attorney, as some have suggested, and if we linked it publicly we may disadvantage ourselves. Remember, the prosecution can and will be reading the FB page. It's standard procedure.
So, I cam up with an idea that is probably not gonna work, but hey, it's worth a shot for now. I'm getting Qara to message Mr. A and request he get an agent in the general area to provide false testimony. Yes, that IS illegal, but hey, the court Pan is in is BS anyhow. Might as well BS to help the innocent. Basically, we get Mr. A to send an agent who has no alibi for that time, then have him testify that he was walking by the room with the door ajar, and heard the conversation. He uses the information gleaned from the echo to know things that he otherwise could not have known and the court accepts the evidence.
There we go. However, I suspect that this won't work. Most likely thing is that A just says that he doesn't have an agent around or something. I got nothing better to do with a few minutes of my time, though, so hey, why not?
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:29 am
by narrativedilettante
Sicon112 wrote:OK, so we should really probably use this information somehow to help out Pan. I'm not sure it would gain us anything to link the echo to the attorney, as some have suggested, and if we linked it publicly we may disadvantage ourselves. Remember, the prosecution can and will be reading the FB page. It's standard procedure.
So, I cam up with an idea that is probably not gonna work, but hey, it's worth a shot for now. I'm getting Qara to message Mr. A and request he get an agent in the general area to provide false testimony. Yes, that IS illegal, but hey, the court Pan is in is BS anyhow. Might as well BS to help the innocent. Basically, we get Mr. A to send an agent who has no alibi for that time, then have him testify that he was walking by the room with the door ajar, and heard the conversation. He uses the information gleaned from the echo to know things that he otherwise could not have known and the court accepts the evidence.
There we go. However, I suspect that this won't work. Most likely thing is that A just says that he doesn't have an agent around or something. I got nothing better to do with a few minutes of my time, though, so hey, why not?
I'm assuming this won't work, mostly because, as you say, Mr. A probably won't go along with it. However, if it did work, I'm worried it would put us in a worse position than we've been in. The prosecutor might go after the fake witness, find/create evidence that the witness wasn't in the correct place to overhear the conversation, and have a new weapon to attack Pan's case with. (Not that it would make much difference, as he's pretty much slaughtering Pan already.)
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:46 am
by Dryunya
Pan's reassembled vid. Just as planned.
Lifetime is 30 days, so I think Ed should post it on WTF channel or something. After that, feel free to show it to the attorney.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:49 am
by JRPictures
Dryunya wrote:Pan's reassembled vid. Just as planned.
Lifetime is 30 days, so I think Ed should post it on WTF channel or something. After that, feel free to show it to the attorney.
Fantastic job. Have a lime

Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:52 am
by Dryunya
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:09 am
by S_o_S
Dryunya wrote:Pan's reassembled vid. Just as planned.
Lifetime is 30 days, so I think Ed should post it on WTF channel or something. After that, feel free to show it to the attorney.
Way to go Dryu! Dryu for Lime Tier.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 9:50 am
by narrativedilettante
Yay! The reassembled video looks conclusive enough to me. No reasonable person would think Pan is throwing that girl off the bridge. Then again, from what we've seen so far the judge and the jury don't act much like reasonable people.
But this is good. The prosecution's job will be somewhat harder now.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:55 am
by Dryunya
I think they are not even trying to forge it hard enough.
I could do a better job.

Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 5:09 pm
by Scarab
Dryunya wrote:I think they are not even trying to forge it hard enough.
I could do a better job.

Peter is kinda adorable

We really need to get this guy home before reality decides to go and break the cutie, guys.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:56 pm
by WackyMeetsPractical
Great job on the video. That should help Pan for sure. Did anybody pass it along to the attorney yet?
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 7:51 pm
by Qara-Xuan Zenith
DRYU HAS BECOME A PUPPY! WELCOME TO PUPPYNESS!
And seriously, great job on reassembling that video.
...
Dryunya wrote:Pan's reassembled vid. Just as planned.
Lifetime is 30 days, so I think
Joe should post it on WTF channel or something. After that, feel free to show it to the attorney.
Then I can link the attorney. Or I can link him your temp file, since Joe might have a lot on his hands atm before he can put it up.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 8:22 pm
by Blurred_9L
Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:Then I can link the attorney. Or I can link him your temp file, since Joe might have a lot on his hands atm before he can put it up.
So, did Qara already sent the video? I can send this one throught private message too, if you need that.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 8:24 pm
by Dryunya
The video hasn't been sent yet. I think we should wait a little more. Because I don't want to make one more dead link on the internet.
(Also, you know it's not going anywhere, especially now that the GMs know we are done with it.
)
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 8:29 pm
by WackyMeetsPractical
Dryunya wrote:The video hasn't been sent yet. I think we should wait a little more. Because I don't want to make one more dead link on the internet.
(Also, you know it's not going anywhere, especially now that the GMs know we are done with it.
)
The sooner we do this, the better. I don't feel comfortable just sitting on this knowing how much trouble Pan is in right now.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 8:48 pm
by Blurred_9L
WackyMeetsPractical wrote:
The sooner we do this, the better. I don't feel comfortable just sitting on this knowing how much trouble Pan is in right now.
I agree, but if the GMs already noticed then there's no problem. If you need to send it, just tell me then.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:36 pm
by Qara-Xuan Zenith
Maybe PM it to Joe specifically asking him to post it, then? I know we can assume he's seen it here, but if he's got a lot to deal with right now he might not remember to get around to it without the request and link sitting handily in his inbox.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:52 pm
by Blurred_9L
Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:Maybe PM it to Joe specifically asking him to post it, then? I know we can assume he's seen it here, but if he's got a lot to deal with right now he might not remember to get around to it without the request and link sitting handily in his inbox.
I'll be getting that done then. Then we'll just have to wait, like always :p
Edit: I've sent the message. I'm pretty sure somebody already mentioned in Pan's Facebook page that we have the video, but should we sent another message to his lawyer in case he needs it?
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sun Nov 25, 2012 2:58 am
by Qara-Xuan Zenith
...Well, looks like someone's already linked it. Or is that Jane person you, Blur? (or... I think I've seen that name on the forum before? but not much.)
(It's kind of annoying to have Metaguards who post a lot on the character blogs/facebook/with elephants but not on the forums, because that makes it harder to coordinate who's saying what. Jane Locke, if you're reading this, please come drop by more often! But thanks for linking Dryu's findings to the attorney.)
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sun Nov 25, 2012 1:35 pm
by Blurred_9L
Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:...Well, looks like someone's already linked it. Or is that Jane person you, Blur?
I'm going to pretend I didn't read that... >.<
By the way, no, it's not me.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sun Nov 25, 2012 2:01 pm
by JLocke
Looking for someone?
Sorry guys, I should have posted here before, but I don't really have much time on my hands. I usually watch the blogs and the timeline. Besides, no harm done, right?

Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sun Nov 25, 2012 2:39 pm
by H22
In a minute or two, Morgan will 'officially' have the video. I mean, she does read the forums, does she not? See Cabal Contact for my full email.
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Sun Nov 25, 2012 4:26 pm
by Qara-Xuan Zenith
JLocke wrote:Looking for someone?
Sorry guys, I should have posted here before, but I don't really have much time on my hands. I usually watch the blogs and the timeline. Besides, no harm done, right?

Certainly no harm done. Looks like you did just what we needed. I hear you on the time constraints, Jane. You're welcome around the forums/chatroom whenever you can make it!
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:33 pm
by Terrac1
Genndy Oda C.O.G. wrote:Ah, Ace Attorney. The closest thing most people have to knowing actual court procedure.
Hey give me some credit I am actually studying law. But when it comes to cases that are rigged against the defense this bad, have an incompetent / bribed / stupid judge and an amoral attorney what's the first thing to come to mind?
Re: Ron Deckland and Peter Pan

Posted:
Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:46 pm
by Sicon112
Terrac1 wrote:Genndy Oda C.O.G. wrote:Ah, Ace Attorney. The closest thing most people have to knowing actual court procedure.
Hey give me some credit I am actually studying law. But when it comes to cases that are rigged against the defense this bad, have an incompetent / bribed / stupid judge and an amoral attorney what's the first thing to come to mind?
Then again, it doesn't really matter how impossible the case is set up to be. Due to Mr. A's actions it is really impossible for Pan to lose at this point, which was really clever of him. Worst case scenario, that loony manages to get the jury on his side because we failed to help out with the evidence, which we already have, and even then all we need to do is point out how many laws were broken and boom,verdict overturned.