Page 1 of 1
ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:34 pmby Mr. Administrator
WE HAVE NOTICED SEVERAL OF YOU HAVE CHOSEN TO INTERFACE WITH FICTIONALS, EVEN FURTHERING THEIR GOALS. WHILE NOT PART OF OUR INITIAL INSTRUCTIONS, THIS IS GOOD. BEING INTEGRATED INTO THEIR LIVES ALLOWS US A MORE IN-DEPTH LOOK INTO THEIR ACTIVITIES, AND THEIR BEHAVIOR ON THIS SIDE OF THE WALL MAY YIELD VALUABLE DATA ON HOW TO SEND THEM BACK.
ALREADY WE HAVE FORMED SEVERAL HYPOTHESES BASED OFF YOUR INTERACTIONS, FURTHER INTERACTIONS WILL HELP US VERIFY THEM.
WE ARE PLEASED. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:35 pmby Lordxana0
Mr. Administrator wrote:WE HAVE NOTICED SEVERAL OF YOU HAVE CHOSEN TO INTERFACE WITH FICTIONALS, EVEN FURTHERING THEIR GOALS. WHILE NOT PART OF OUR INITIAL INSTRUCTIONS, THIS IS GOOD. BEING INTEGRATED INTO THEIR LIVES ALLOWS US A MORE IN-DEPTH LOOK INTO THEIR ACTIVITIES, AND THEIR BEHAVIOR ON THIS SIDE OF THE WALL MAY YIELD VALUABLE DATA ON HOW TO SEND THEM BACK.
ALREADY WE HAVE FORMED SEVERAL HYPOTHESES BASED OFF YOUR INTERACTIONS, FURTHER INTERACTIONS WILL HELP US VERIFY THEM.
WE ARE PLEASED. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.
Glad to help.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:36 pmby The Finch
You're Welcome.
...
...
...
WAIT, IS THERE ANY NEWS ON THE RIDDLE THE CAT SENT US?
WHAT ABOUT THAT WEBSITE THAT DRYUANA HAD? WHERE IS THAT THREAD?
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:37 pmby Victin
The Finch wrote:You're Welcome.
...
...
...
WAIT, IS THERE ANY NEWS ON THE RIDDLE THE CAT SENT US?
WHAT ABOUT THAT WEBSITE THAT DRYUANA HAD? WHERE IS THAT THREAD?
No
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:38 pmby The Finch
Victin wrote:The Finch wrote:You're Welcome.
...
...
...
WAIT, IS THERE ANY NEWS ON THE RIDDLE THE CAT SENT US?
WHAT ABOUT THAT WEBSITE THAT DRYUANA HAD? WHERE IS THAT THREAD?
No
Oh. Ok then.
IS THERE ANY NEWS ON THAT RIDDLE, THOUGH?
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:43 pmby Mr. Administrator
ALL SIGNS INDICATE THAT THE RIDDLE POINTS TOWARDS A PHYSICAL OBJECT IN THE VICINITY OF THE STATUE.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:45 pmby The Finch
Mr. Administrator wrote:ALL SIGNS INDICATE THAT THE RIDDLE POINTS TOWARDS A PHYSICAL OBJECT IN THE VICINITY OF THE STATUE.
A physical object? ALRIGHT, SOMEONE HAS TO GO TO THE STATUE
I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU PLANNED ON DOING OR ARE PLANNING, SOMEONE HAS TO GO.
Wait, what if someone has taken the object already?
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:49 pmby Goldude
Are we doing a good job with the witch?
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:49 pmby WackyMeetsPractical
The Finch wrote:Mr. Administrator wrote:ALL SIGNS INDICATE THAT THE RIDDLE POINTS TOWARDS A PHYSICAL OBJECT IN THE VICINITY OF THE STATUE.
A physical object? ALRIGHT, SOMEONE HAS TO GO TO THE STATUE
I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU PLANNED ON DOING OR ARE PLANNING, SOMEONE HAS TO GO.
Wait, what if someone has taken the object already?
Somebody's already on it. Check the Riddles thread on the Cheshire Cat forum. Somebody's going today.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:03 pmby Dryunya
Goldude wrote:Are we doing a good job with the witch?
Right! That's what I've asked in the thread: are we still supposed to interact with the witch? Making her a president of the USA is kind of counter-productive. I'd say it's an outright Violation Of Common Sense.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:16 pmby Mr. Administrator
Dryunya wrote:Goldude wrote:Are we doing a good job with the witch?
Right! That's what I've asked in the thread: are we still supposed to interact with the witch? Making her a president of the USA is kind of counter-productive. I'd say it's an outright Violation Of Common Sense.
REALISTICALLY, THE WITCH WOULD ONLY HAVE ANY REAL INFLUENCE IN SWING STATES AND POTENTIALLY CALIFORNIA.
ALLOWING HER TO BELIEVE SHE COULD INFLUENCE THE ELECTORAL PROCESS IN A MAJOR WAY WOULD ALLOW US TO FURTHER RAISE AWARENESS OF THE FICTIONAL THREAT AND GATHER ADDITIONAL DATA ON FICTIONALS OPERATING IN REALITY.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:18 pmby Pixelmage
Mr. Administrator wrote:Dryunya wrote:Goldude wrote:Are we doing a good job with the witch?
Right! That's what I've asked in the thread: are we still supposed to interact with the witch? Making her a president of the USA is kind of counter-productive. I'd say it's an outright Violation Of Common Sense.
REALISTICALLY, THE WITCH WOULD ONLY HAVE ANY REAL INFLUENCE IN SWING STATES AND POTENTIALLY CALIFORNIA.
ALLOWING HER TO BELIEVE SHE COULD INFLUENCE THE ELECTORAL PROCESS IN A MAJOR WAY WOULD ALLOW US TO FURTHER RAISE AWARENESS OF THE FICTIONAL THREAT AND GATHER ADDITIONAL DATA ON FICTIONALS OPERATING IN REALITY.
That's assuming we CAN actually help her... It's still quite risky.
Also, what's with that @RealityEnds on twitter, found nothing on him here, seems like a player trolling around... Is he related to us? PM link or answer to avoid derailing, maybe?
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:19 pmby Dryunya
Mr. Administrator wrote:REALISTICALLY, THE WITCH WOULD ONLY HAVE ANY REAL INFLUENCE IN SWING STATES AND POTENTIALLY CALIFORNIA.
Now you're just Tempting Fate.
Pixelmage wrote:Also, what's with that @RealityEnds on twitter, found nothing on him here, seems like a player trolling around... Is he related to us? PM link or answer to avoid derailing, maybe?
Dude. rEALITY is a confirmed player. Haven't you read the timeline?
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:21 pmby NeverSlender
Dryunya wrote:Mr. Administrator wrote:REALISTICALLY, THE WITCH WOULD ONLY HAVE ANY REAL INFLUENCE IN SWING STATES AND POTENTIALLY CALIFORNIA.
Now you're just Tempting Fate.
Pixelmage wrote:Also, what's with that @RealityEnds on twitter, found nothing on him here, seems like a player trolling around... Is he related to us? PM link or answer to avoid derailing, maybe?
Dude. rEALITY is a confirmed player. Haven't you read the timeline?
Wouldn't help his infos still in orange.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:50 pmby Pixelmage
NeverSlender wrote:Dryunya wrote:Mr. Administrator wrote:REALISTICALLY, THE WITCH WOULD ONLY HAVE ANY REAL INFLUENCE IN SWING STATES AND POTENTIALLY CALIFORNIA.
Now you're just Tempting Fate.
Pixelmage wrote:Also, what's with that @RealityEnds on twitter, found nothing on him here, seems like a player trolling around... Is he related to us? PM link or answer to avoid derailing, maybe?
Dude. rEALITY is a confirmed player. Haven't you read the timeline?
Wouldn't help his infos still in orange.
Yup, pretty orange there. And since I didn't find mentions of him in the forum here, I though it'd be worth asking. Sorry for the derail.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:51 pmby Sophira
NeverSlender wrote:Dryunya wrote:Mr. Administrator wrote:REALISTICALLY, THE WITCH WOULD ONLY HAVE ANY REAL INFLUENCE IN SWING STATES AND POTENTIALLY CALIFORNIA.
Now you're just Tempting Fate.
Pixelmage wrote:Also, what's with that @RealityEnds on twitter, found nothing on him here, seems like a player trolling around... Is he related to us? PM link or answer to avoid derailing, maybe?
Dude. rEALITY is a confirmed player. Haven't you read the timeline?
Wouldn't help his infos still in orange.
That's because they're a confirmed
player, not a confirmed
character - just like most other people on this forum. They're not an official part of the ARG.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:57 pmby NeverSlender
Yeah but he's listed as a fake so people will probably ignore him.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:04 pmby Adell
Stay on topic people.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:34 pmby Scarab
More interaction with the characters must surely happen at some point. At the very least if the Witch chooses a manager from our collective surely meeting would only be logical? And then there's the fact that Don is going to get himself committed at this rate...
That's assuming we CAN actually help her... It's still quite risky.
Indeed, I've been trying to think of exctly what we'd DO if one of us were selected and aside from thinking of various ways that would actually HELP her come across as credible... it's liable that everyone would think she's a joke, like the MRLP, I mean, the Wicked Witch of the West running for president? Come on, somebody's going to call bad Political Joke on that one...
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:31 pmby Victin
Hidden user on, is it you Mr. Cake?
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:32 pmby Sicon112
Victin wrote:Hidden user on, is it you Mr. Cake?
He appears to be on the user list when he is here, most of the time. I think it is actually Yankee.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:33 pmby The Finch
Sicon112 wrote:Victin wrote:Hidden user on, is it you Mr. Cake?
He appears to be on the user list when he is here, most of the time. I think it is actually Yankee.
Yankee, is it you?
Wait, Yankee is also noticeable when he is on... so...
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:34 pmby Dryunya
My guess is spambots. I've PM'd Ed about 2 of these.
For the record, our forum has a stable number of 90 members. Any fluctuations in this number are suspicious.
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:15 pmby The Wild West Pyro
Thankyouverymuch, Mr. Administrator.
We will try to look at the statue when we have time.
Your obedient Servant- The Wild West Pyro
Re: ON INTERFACING WITH FICTIONALS
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:39 pmby Victin
Include a note with this site written on it AND explaining:
"IF YOU ARE NOT RELATED TO THE FALL OF THE WALL, PLEASE PUT THIS BACK WHERE YOU FOUND IT."