Page 2 of 2
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:36 pmby Qara-Xuan Zenith
Dryunya wrote:Bump. For the next several days, starting today, I'll be badly out of sync again. Somebody watch the timeline for now.
DONT. SCREW. UP. Our descendants shall thank you for this.
I'll do my best. Though I'll be offline for most of Friday night/Saturday, so someone else should be watching then.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:54 amby Qara-Xuan Zenith
Question: Should we split the Timeline to Act IV before November 15, when the Cabal took their Wall Piece? Because that really changed things up, and compared to the first two, Act III is a little too long.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:54 pmby Dryunya
I'm fine with it.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:05 amby Qara-Xuan Zenith
I'm not going to be around much until Monday. Can someone else please assist in making sure the Timeline's kept up-to-date until I'm more back? thanks.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:24 amby Dryunya
Got you covered.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 10:05 amby Qara-Xuan Zenith
Dryunya wrote:Got you covered.
I meant someone other than you. Because I don't want you to try to go for three days without sleeping.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:57 pmby Dryunya
I'm not going to sleep for at least 2 of them, but yeah, it would be nice to have a backup.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:30 pmby Pixelmage
I have never edited the Timeline. I am afraid I'll break it.
And I'm not exactly sure what should be added or not and such things... But... Maybe I'll try?
Can't promise anything though.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:32 pmby Dryunya
Just do what comes natural. Susie doesn't mind.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:10 pmby JackAlsworth
(my god, you're calling the timeline Susie? XD)
Pixel, it's just like editing any other page on the wiki. If you have any particular questions, just PM someone (here or on TVTropes) and we'll be glad to help out.
(seriously? Susie?
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:38 pmby Dryunya
I'm dead serious. And after all we've been through, I should marry her. She rejected me, but I won't give up.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:40 pmby Genndy Oda C.O.G.
Well, that is mildly disturbing.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:52 pmby Pixelmage
Does the timeline count as a weapon? <-- Is insane.
Because if so, Dryu is totally
CallingItSusie
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:52 pmby Scarab
Genndy Oda C.O.G. wrote:Well, that is mildly disturbing.
Just smile and nod and walk slowly backwards towards the door. Don't take your eyes off him. I'll call the cops.
Pixelmage wrote:Does the timeline count as a weapon? <-- Is insane.
If it did, it'd be a frickin' humdinger.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:53 pmby Victin
Pixelmage wrote:Does the timeline count as a weapon? <-- Is insane.
Because if so, Dryu is totally
CallingItSusie
Of course it does
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 07, 2012 8:12 pmby Pixelmage
Well, too late, Dryu has a new trope.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:33 amby Qara-Xuan Zenith
I, uh, this probably isn't a good time, but based on the pacing and the big-deal-ness of this, I think Cthulhu warrants an Act 5 on the Timeline. I'll wait for approval (at least from Dryu, since it's kind of his baby too, though other people's input would be appreciated) before adding that in, of course.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:41 amby Dryunya
Act 5: Endgame.
Works fine for me.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:50 amby Qara-Xuan Zenith
Done.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:54 amby H22
Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:I, uh, this probably isn't a good time, but based on the pacing and the big-deal-ness of this, I think Cthulhu warrants an Act 5 on the Timeline. I'll wait for approval (at least from Dryu, since it's kind of his baby too, though other people's input would be appreciated) before adding that in, of course.
There ARE certain advantages to but 3 acts (Shakespeare, the unities and all that) but, since this is kind of what we've been waiting for, it seems a good idea.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:56 amby narrativedilettante
H22 wrote:There ARE certain advantages to but 3 acts (Shakespeare, the unities and all that) but, since this is kind of what we've been waiting for, it seems a good idea.
Uh, Shakespeare's plays were 5 acts.
Re: Timelime
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:40 pmby H22
My mistake. The classical allusion but is true, though.
Rerail.