Page 1 of 1

Bigger cracks=more dangerous characters.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 12:27 am
by Lordxana0
Right now all that has passed through the cracks are things that might present a challenege but nothing that a few bullets couldn't handle. Is it possible that the larger the cracks created the more powerful and or large a character will be able to pass through. Just a thought.

Re: Bigger cracks=more dangerous characters.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:56 am
by Pixelmage
I honestly do not belive bullets would even find a way to hit Cheshire... :lol: He wouldn't be there when the bullets reached his general location.

But I agree that so far, everyone is pretty much harmless in a direct confrontation sense. Even if the sparkly from the WTF videos is a twilight fairy that can rip trees from the ground, it didn't seem to actually care about doing that... So... Pretty harmless. It's a fairy, it can only be harmless. (Pray that the Queen of Air and Darkness does not hear me. :shock:)

Re: Bigger cracks=more dangerous characters.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:30 am
by Scarab
Perhaps Cheshire is simply not working according to the rules of our reality (if he were he'd be an ordinary house cat)?

When you start thinking about the extremes of exactly WHAT could start coming through... this whole thing starts to get really terrifying. I mean, how many doosmday devices exist in fiction? How many world destroying viruses? How many evil overlords who might actually do some damage?

Maybe the cracks are facillitated by the characters themselves, too - the more who come through, the wider the cracks, and the more CAN come through...

Re: Bigger cracks=more dangerous characters.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 3:43 pm
by Scarab
And guess who we seem to have leaking through from fiction and playing their devious little games now? Moriarty, along with his archnemesis Holmes. Of all the villains it could've been, it just HAD to be that guy...

Well I guess it could've been worse. Still this is definitely something far more specific than before. I think the cracks are widening.

Re: Bigger cracks=more dangerous characters.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:15 pm
by Endless Sea
I gotta wonder which Holmes and Moriarty came over, though. The originals? The film versions? The ones from the BBC Sherlock modern-day reboot?

Note that I haven't actually seen the blog yet, not to mention I haven't read much of the original stories or seen the films, so I'm pretty much completely in the dark here.

EDIT: Okay, so he's unused to the internet. That narrows it down, I guess.

Re: Bigger cracks=more dangerous characters.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:32 pm
by Sicon112
Endless Sea wrote:I gotta wonder which Holmes and Moriarty came over, though. The originals? The film versions? The ones from the BBC Sherlock modern-day reboot?

Note that I haven't actually seen the blog yet, not to mention I haven't read much of the original stories or seen the films, so I'm pretty much completely in the dark here.

EDIT: Okay, so he's unused to the internet. That narrows it down, I guess.


I can confirm, at least, that the Holmes we have the honor of talking with is the original one, written by Doyle himself. As I stated elsewhere, I have read all of Doyle's Holmes series, and even have them one room over from me as I type this. That is unmistakably Holmes.

Re: Bigger cracks=more dangerous characters.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:06 am
by Scarab
I can confirm, at least, that the Holmes we have the honor of talking with is the original one, written by Doyle himself. As I stated elsewhere, I have read all of Doyle's Holmes series, and even have them one room over from me as I type this. That is unmistakably Holmes.


Man, I know the stability of reality is udner threat and everything but... still, THE Sherlock Holmes.Awesome. :)

So it would make sense if it were the same Moriarty, then, although perhaps it's not... From what I've seen he seems QUITE aware of modern technicalities, moreso than Holmes anyway.

Maybe multiple-media franchises like Holmes, who's had everything from books and movies to videogames, will be amongst the first to seep through, alongside the oddler, more fundamental or archtypical stuff (Cinerella and the plague man came through because they're ancient concepts and thus have more weight behing them, and Holmes has strength due to it's multimedia nature?

Course if that were true we could end up with more than ONE Holmes running around.

Re: Bigger cracks=more dangerous characters.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:05 am
by Dryunya
Scarab wrote:Course if that were true we could end up with more than ONE Holmes running around.

And now I've imagined Sherlocks Holmes doing a Super Sentai Stance. :lol:

Re: Bigger cracks=more dangerous characters.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:08 am
by Scarab
And now I've imagined Sherlocks Holmes doing a Super Sentai Stance.


And our worlds are all the brighter and more amusing for it :lol: