Page 1 of 3

New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:40 pm
by Flitterbie
It appears as though we have ourselves a hate crime.

At least, that's what it appears to be. This could, of course, be a ruse. Who even knows anymore.

What we know:
-A homosexual couple has been trying to organize a public event.
-They have repeatedly been given bomb threats, causing them to cancel the plans last-minute
-The threats are apparently coming from an extremist religous group
-Every time they have planned the event, they have received the threat without fail
-Searches for bugs have turned up nothing
-Hercule suspects that the weapon will be brought to the event, rather than having been planted in advance
-We have a quote from one of the threats:
“The blazes of this bomb that will rip you limb from limb is too good for you, but it is all that I can do; the rest I will leave to God, and your lack of penance and flaunting of your sin will surely cause you to face the worst of God’s wrath.”

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:42 pm
by IslaKariese
It would certainly seem so... religious nature?

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:44 pm
by Flitterbie
IslaKariese wrote:It would certainly seem so... religious nature?


Of course, it could just as easily be someone using that as a front. Never assume evil while asshole remains an option.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:45 pm
by Sicon112
IslaKariese wrote:It would certainly seem so... religious nature?


Muslim extremist, perhaps? Their religion is not very... gay friendly. Not to insult anyone or anything, but it really is true...

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:46 pm
by Flitterbie
Sicon112 wrote:
IslaKariese wrote:It would certainly seem so... religious nature?


Muslim extremist, perhaps? Their religion is not very... gay friendly. Not to insult anyone or anything, but it really is true...


Could just as easily, and I think more likely, be Christian Extremist. Think a slightly-more-militant Westboro Baptist Church.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:47 pm
by Sicon112
Flitterbie wrote:
Sicon112 wrote:
IslaKariese wrote:It would certainly seem so... religious nature?


Muslim extremist, perhaps? Their religion is not very... gay friendly. Not to insult anyone or anything, but it really is true...


Could just as easily, and I think more likely, be Christian Extremist. Think a slightly-more-militant Westboro Baptist Church.


That IS a possibility, but I think a far less likely one.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:52 pm
by Flitterbie
Sicon112 wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:
Sicon112 wrote:
Muslim extremist, perhaps? Their religion is not very... gay friendly. Not to insult anyone or anything, but it really is true...


Could just as easily, and I think more likely, be Christian Extremist. Think a slightly-more-militant Westboro Baptist Church.


That IS a possibility, but I think a far less likely one.


Honestly, any other part of the world, I might agree. USA, though, much more likely to be Christians. I'm sad to say that some of us have... unfortunate tendencies. It's that whole Leviticus 18:22 thing.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:57 pm
by IslaKariese
Flitterbie wrote:Honestly, any other part of the world, I might agree. USA, though, much more likely to be Christians. I'm sad to say that some of us have... unfortunate tendencies. It's that whole Leviticus 18:22 thing.

Nevermind that half of the Old Testament is obsolete anyway... *grumble, grumble* Those kinds of people always give Christians a bad name.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:58 pm
by Sicon112
IslaKariese wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:Honestly, any other part of the world, I might agree. USA, though, much more likely to be Christians. I'm sad to say that some of us have... unfortunate tendencies. It's that whole Leviticus 18:22 thing.

Nevermind that half of the Old Testament is obsolete anyway... *grumble, grumble* Those kinds of people always give Christians a bad name.


Obsolete is a bad choice of words, but I get what you mean...

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:59 pm
by Flitterbie
IslaKariese wrote:
Flitterbie wrote:Honestly, any other part of the world, I might agree. USA, though, much more likely to be Christians. I'm sad to say that some of us have... unfortunate tendencies. It's that whole Leviticus 18:22 thing.

Nevermind that half of the Old Testament is obsolete anyway... *grumble, grumble* Those kinds of people always give Christians a bad name.


To be fair, the New Testament is worse. Old Testament never mentions lesbians.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:02 pm
by IslaKariese
Sicon112 wrote:Obsolete is a bad choice of words, but I get what you mean...

Flitterbie wrote:To be fair, the New Testament is worse. Old Testament never mentions lesbians.

Yeah, I know. It just gets me mad. I may just stay away from this thread. No place for a religion debate.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:03 pm
by Sicon112
IslaKariese wrote:
Sicon112 wrote:Obsolete is a bad choice of words, but I get what you mean...

Flitterbie wrote:To be fair, the New Testament is worse. Old Testament never mentions lesbians.

Yeah, I know. It just gets me mad. I may just stay away from this thread. No place for a religion debate.


It may be like they said above, an asshole pretending just to cause trouble.

Actually, I think it more likely that there is an ulterior motive. It just makes a better story that way.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:04 pm
by Flitterbie
Sicon112 wrote:
IslaKariese wrote:
Sicon112 wrote:Obsolete is a bad choice of words, but I get what you mean...

Flitterbie wrote:To be fair, the New Testament is worse. Old Testament never mentions lesbians.

Yeah, I know. It just gets me mad. I may just stay away from this thread. No place for a religion debate.


It may be like they said above, an asshole pretending just to cause trouble.

Actually, I think it more likely that there is an ulterior motive. It just makes a better story that way.


No, I didn't mean they were pretending to cause trouble. Just that they were pretending to be doing it as part of a religious group.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:07 pm
by Sicon112
Flitterbie wrote:No, I didn't mean they were pretending to cause trouble. Just that they were pretending to be doing it as part of a religious group.


I knew that. >.< This time it was me with bad word choice.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:01 pm
by Sicon112
Just read the description again... something isn't right here. First, why do you all seem to be assuming that he has been hired by two people? He never seems to say exactly how many there are. In fact, it seems as though it is a large apartment type place with many people in it.

As to the possible information leaks... perhaps a mole? There doesn't seem to be a lot of information. It doesn't even give me any names. Unless, of course, this somehow is connected to some other plot point, but HOW? *sigh* I'll just think on this for a while and let you know if something comes to me.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:04 pm
by Flitterbie
Sicon112 wrote:Just read the description again... something isn't right here. First, why do you all seem to be assuming that he has been hired by two people? He never seems to say exactly how many there are. In fact, it seems as though it is a large apartment type place with many people in it.

As to the possible information leaks... perhaps a mole? There doesn't seem to be a lot of information. It doesn't even give me any names. Unless, of course, this somehow is connected to some other plot point, but HOW? *sigh* I'll just think on this for a while and let you know if something comes to me.


I think it's just that the natural assumption is that it's a couple.

As for the mole, I've already considered that, hence my question I posted to his blog.

On an unrelated note, I officially announce my suspicion of Cinderella for this crime. Because she needs to get involved.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:07 pm
by Sicon112
Flitterbie wrote:I think it's just that the natural assumption is that it's a couple.

As for the mole, I've already considered that, hence my question I posted to his blog.

On an unrelated note, I officially announce my suspicion of Cinderella for this crime. Because she needs to get involved.


I don't think it's a natural assumption at all. He refers to his location as a very large place, and talks about how "everyone has been awfully kind". Never does he talk about the clients as though they are a small group of people. Every time they are mentioned he speak as though talking about at least five or six.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:47 am
by The Wild West Pyro
Actually, here's my theory:

No Offense intended, but I suspect the extremist is Muslim.

http://belgianamongtheenglish.wordpress ... /#comments

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 9:32 am
by Flitterbie
The Wild West Pyro wrote:Actually, here's my theory:

No Offense intended, but I suspect the extremist is Muslim.

http://belgianamongtheenglish.wordpress ... /#comments


Was that link supposed to be connected to that theory?

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:05 pm
by Dryunya
I believe the comment wasn't approved yet. ;)

To the point: I know I'm terrible at the detectives' plotline, but I think that (UPD: Poirot's) post reveals ridiculously little.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:37 pm
by Flitterbie
Yeah, I just don't buy that it's Muslim. I dunno, the idea of Muslim extremists in NYC with bomb threats seems a little too... on the nose.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:46 pm
by NeverSlender
There's zero evidence suggesting the extremists are muslim. There's zero evidence to their identity at all. It could be the IRA for all we know. If you extremists and think "muslims", you need to do some research. Anyone can be an extremist.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:30 pm
by Flitterbie
NeverSlender wrote:There's zero evidence suggesting the extremists are muslim. There's zero evidence to their identity at all. It could be the IRA for all we know. If you extremists and think "muslims", you need to do some research. Anyone can be an extremist.


Yeah, turns out Pyro assumed Muslims because "There is a huge rift between Americans and Muslims at the moment," which is a faulty assumption on several points.

A) He's lumping all Muslims together.
B) My previous post.

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:59 pm
by Sicon112
In any case, the argument is very possibly pointless because there is a good chance it is all just a cover for something else behind the scenes. Could we get back on track?

Re: New York, New Case

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 6:40 pm
by Flitterbie
New post. Updating first post shortly.